Skip to main content
. 2006 Aug;173(4):2257–2267. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.047472

TABLE 3.

Robustness of estimates of ρ

Scenario ρ0 = 20 ρ0 = 40 ρ0 = 60
Growtha (27, 1.0, 0.81) (45, 0.60, 0.90) (55, 0.43, 1.0)
Growthb (26, 0.80, 0.84) (48, 0.58, 0.90) (61, 0.35, 1.0)
Growthc (29, 1.0, 0.80) (49, 0.62, 0.88) (62, 0.38, 1.0)
Gene conversiona (28, 1.0, 0.79) (48, 0.65, 0.86) (60, 0.40, 1.0)
Gene conversionb (28, 0.85, 0.81) (51, 0.60, 0.87) (64, 0.38, 1.0)
Gene conversionc (30, 1.0, 0.76) (52, 0.65, 0.84) (66, 0.40, 1.0)
Subpopulationa (22, 1.1, 0.86) (41, 0.58, 0.92) (55, 0.42, 1.0)
Subpopulationb (21, 0.74, 0.90) (41, 0.49, 0.95) (58, 0.36, 1.0)
Subpopulationc (23, 0.92, 0.86) (43, 0.57, 0.91) (59, 0.38, 1.0)

Notation is as in Table 2. See text for details. Simulations are run under dependent calling, with probe coverage of 3.3% and three combinations of (sensitivity, specificity):

a

(0.34, 1.0).

b

(1.0, 1.0).

c

(0.68, 0.75).