Skip to main content
. 2006 Sep;174(1):519–523. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.059311

TABLE 1.

Frameshift mutation probability

Repeats in coding DNAa Repeats in essential coding DNAa Mutation rateb
Mutation probability, generation 160c
Repeat Wild type MMR Wild type MMR
≥10 A/T 143 22 4.7 × 10−8 3.1 × 10−4 0.00033 0.89
≥10 G/C 0 0 7.0 × 10−8 7.5 × 10−4 0.0 0.0
7 A/T 2998 561d 3.8 × 10−9 1.6 × 10−6 0.00068 0.25
7 G/C 81 18 1.9 × 10−8 7.6 × 10−6 0.00011 0.043
a

Number of repeats in haploids (http://www.yeastgenome.org).

b

Rates of frameshifts (mutations per generation) within indicated repeats in wild-type and MMR null strains, taken or estimated from Tran et al. (1997) and Harfe and Jinks-Robertson (2000). Note that rates at specific loci may vary, depending on factors such as chromosomal location and sequence context (Harfe and Jinks-Robertson 2000; Hawk et al. 2005). The probability of incurring mutations in a given set of sequences within a given number of generations was calculated assuming a Poisson distribution, as one minus the probability of incurring no mutations, which was calculated as p(x = 0) = e−(μ)(no. of loci) (no. of generations), where μ is mutations per locus per generation.

c

Probability of incurring frameshift mutations within essential genes containing the indicated type of repeat.

d

Calculated on the basis of the percentage of genes in the genome that are essential (18.7%).