Skip to main content
. 2006 Sep;174(1):499–509. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.054213

TABLE 1.

Comparison of VDR haplotype frequencies estimated from different methods

Haplotypes EM-Parent EM-Sib EM-Single GH-Sib GH-Family FAMHAP-Sib
GTAT 0.0024 0.0010 0.0738 0.0046
GTAC 0.1257 0.1208 0.1337 0.0705 0.1147 0.1197
GTGT 0.1453 0.1421 0.1143 0.1066 0.1479 0.1498
GTGC 0.0028 0.0246 0.0149
GCAT 0.0104 0.0068 0.0073 0.0721 0.0321 0.0062
GCAC 0.2180 0.2089 0.1839 0.1197 0.1686 0.2135
GCGT 0.2298 0.2355 0.2865 0.1754 0.2167 0.2436
GCGC 0.0025 0.0754 0.0149
ATAT 0.0021 0.002 0.0023 0.0066 0.0046
ATAC 0.0173 0.0278 0.0001 0.0131 0.0103 0.0204
ATGT 0.0885 0.0826 0.0799 0.0393 0.0768 0.0830
ATGC 0.0021 0.0027 0.0041 0.0213 0.0057
ACAT 0.0010 0.006 0.0018 0.0033 0.0092
ACAC 0.0404 0.0472 0.0759 0.0443 0.0585 0.0480
ACGT 0.1144 0.1053 0.1075 0.0885 0.1147 0.1061
ACGC 0.0656 0.0057
Discrepancy 0.0342 0.1059 0.3260 0.0922 0.0338

In Tables 13, haplotype frequencies that are estimated from parental samples using the conventional EM algorithm (i.e., EM-Parent) are treated as “true” haplotype frequencies in the population. The discrepancy of haplotype frequencies was calculated using Equation 7. Values in italics are those haplotypes whose frequencies deviated >5% from those estimated from the EM-Parent. FAMHAP-Sib and FAMHAP-Sib-R yielded identical results for haplotypes with small numbers of loci.