Table 5.
Random Forests | REGAL | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity (PPV) | Accuracy | |
A. thaliana | 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.91 | 0.85 (0.86) | 0.88 |
B. napus | 0.73 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.89 | 0.81 (0.82) | 0.85 |
O. sativa | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.72 | 0.87 | 0.82 (0.81) | 0.84 |
Overall | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.89 | 0.83 (0.83) | 0.86 |
REGAL outperforms a second technique from [8] using random forest trees for the identification of C → U editing sites in mitochondrial genomes. As before, we report PPV in parentheses.