Skip to main content
. 2006 Sep 4;7:399. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-399

Table 2.

Blind accuracies for various combinations of filtering and modeling methods

Filtering methods Wrapper methods

BFCS FNN SVM MRA kNN WV
PART 81.1 ± 14.1 (8) 64.4 ± 15.6 (3) 73.3 ± 5.4 (2) 60.0 ± 16.6 (11) 67.8 ± 16.8 (10) 56.7 ± 13.6(14)
NSC 68.9 ± 6.7 (5) 60.0 ± 12.4 (3) 62.2 ± 13.3 (3) 65.6 ± 9.2 (9) 68.9 ± 13.0 (3) 66.7 ± 9.9 (21)
S2N 68.9 ± 6.7 (15) 56.7 ± 16.1 (3) 61.1 ± 15.9 (3) 61.1 ± 14.3 (4) 63.3 ± 17.2 (4) 58.9 ± 12.2 (18)
SAM 71.1 ± 7.4 (12) 64.4 ± 12.0 (3) 67.8 ± 13.6 (3) 63.3 ± 12.2 (10) 74.4 ± 8.7 (7) 63.3 ± 11.2 (9)
Student's t-test 71.1 ± 5.4 (15) 53.3 ± 12.0 (4) 60.0 ± 10.2 (13) 58.9 ± 13.2 (5) 68.9 ± 8.3 (4) 60.0 ± 19.4 (26)
U-test 66.7 ± 9.9 (9) 56.7 ± 16.1 (3) 64.4 ± 13.0 (7) 54.4 ± 10.2 (7) 67.8 ± 11.6 (14) 62.2 ± 12.4 (1)
Welch's t-test 65.6 ± 10.5 (15) 55.6 ± 14.9 (3) 58.9 ± 8.7 (13) 53.3 ± 12.2 67.8 ± 10.5 65.6 ± 13.6 (12)
No filtering 68.9 ± 9.7 (10) 58.9 ± 10.0 (3) 66.7 ± 15.7 (2) 61.1 ± 13.4 (3) 55.6 ± 15.7 (3) 57.8 ± 17.1 (26)

Parenthesized values indicate the numbers of probes used in each model.