Table 4.
Reference | Study population | Exposed cases (no.) | Estimated relative risk (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|
Total cancer | |||
Cohort studies | |||
Hansen et al. 2001 | Male | 109 | 1.0 (0.9–1.3) |
Female | 19 | 1.0 (0.6–1.6) | |
Chang et al. 2003 | Male | 66 | 0.7 (0.5–0.8) |
Female | 250 | 1.0 (0.9–1.1) | |
Raaschou-Nielsen et al. 2003 | Male | 2,434 | 1.1 (1.0–1.1) |
Female | 624 | 1.2 (1.1–1.3) | |
Community studies | |||
Lee et al. 2003 | Upstream village | 266a | 1.0 |
Downstream village | 2.1 (1.3–3.3)b | ||
Morgan and Cassady 2002 | 13 census tracts in San Bernardino County, CA | 3,098 | 1.0 (0.9–1.0) |
Bladder | |||
Cohort studies | |||
Hansen et al. 2001 | Male | 10 | 1.1 (0.5–2.0) |
Female | 0 | ||
Chang et al. 2003 | Male | 1 | 1.0 (0.01–5.4) |
Female | 1 | 1.0 (0.01–5.4) | |
Raaschou-Nielsen et al. 2003 | Male | 203 | 1.0 (0.9–1.2) |
Female | 17 | 1.6 (0.9–2.6) | |
Zhao et al. 2005c | Low TCE score | 7 | 1.0 |
Medium TCE score | 7 | 1.5 (0.8–2.9) | |
High TCE score | 3 | 2.0 (0.9–4.2) | |
Case–control studies | |||
Pesch et al. 2000b | JTEM, male | ||
Medium TCE exposure | 47 | 0.8 (0.6–1.2) | |
High TCE exposure | 74 | 1.3 (0.9–1.7) | |
Substantial TCE exposure | 36 | 1.8 (1.2–2.7) | |
Community studies | |||
Morgan and Cassady 2002 | 13 census tracts in San Bernardino County, CA | 82 | 1.0 (0.8–1.2) |
Breast | |||
Cohort studies | |||
Hansen et al. 2001 | Female | 4 | 0.9 (0.2–2.3) |
Chang et al. 2005 | Female | 215 | 1.2 (1.0–1.4) |
Raaschou-Nielsen et al. 2003 | Male | 2 | 0.5 (0.1–1.9) |
Female | 145 | 1.1 (0.9–1.2) | |
Community studies | |||
Morgan and Cassady 2002 | Females in 13 census tracts in San Bernardino County, CA | 536 | 1.1 (1.0–1.2) |
Esophagus | |||
Cohort studies | |||
Hansen et al. 2001 | Male | 6 | 4.2 (1.5–9.2) |
Female | 0 | ||
Chang et al. 2005 | Male | 0 | |
Female | 0 | ||
Raaschou-Nielsen et al. 2003 | Male | 23d | 1.8 (1.2–2.7) |
Female | 0 | ||
Zhao et al. 2005c,e | Low TCE score | 7 | 1.0 |
Medium TCE score | 7 | 1.7 (0.6–4.4) | |
High TCE score | 3 | 1.3 (0.2–4.0) |
CI, confidence interval.
Total cancer deaths in the two villages.
99% CI.
Zhao et al. (2005) present both cancer incidence and cancer mortality. Relative risks in this table are for cancer incidence.
Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.
Esophageal and stomach cancer incidence.