Skip to main content
. 2006 Feb 1;2006(1):59206. doi: 10.1155/MI/2006/59206

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the study groups (mean ± SD).

Group 1 Group 2 Group 3

Control Long standing IDDM Newly diagnosed IDDM
(C) (LS-IDDM) (ND-IDDM)

Before treatment After treatment P-value
(BT) (AT)

n 25 15 12 12

Glucose (mg/dL) 84.8 ± 13.8 158.3 ± 21.7 470.9 ± 98.1a, b 145.5 ± 24.4 aP < .01 ND-IDDM versus C
ND-IDDM versus
LS-IDDM
bP < .01 LS-IDDM versus C
P < .001 ND-IDDM
(BT versus AT)

HbA1c (%) 5.3 ± 0.7 8.0 ± 1.2b 9.9 ± 1.4a 8.6 ± 1.1 aP < .01 ND-IDDM versus C
ND-IDDM versus
LS-IDDM
bP < .01 LS-IDDM versus C
P < .05 ND-IDDM
(BT versus AT)

Microalbuminuria (mg/L) 6.4 ± 1.0 8.1 ± 1.5 10.2 ± 3.8a 9.4 ± 2.9 aP < .001 ND-IDDM versus C
ND-IDDM versus
LS-IDDM

Urea (mg/dL) 21.8 ± 4.2a 30.7 ± 6.6b 38.1 ± 10.6 31.4 ± 11.8 aP < .01 C versus LS-IDDM
C versus ND-IDDM
bP < .05 ND-IDDM versus
LS-IDDM
P < .05 ND-IDDM
(BT versus AT)

Creatinine (mg/dL) 0.5 ± 0.1 0.8 ± 0.1 0.9 ± 0.2a 0.8 ± 0.2 aP < .01 ND-IDDM versus C
ND-IDDM versus
LS-IDDM

Creatinine clearance (ml/dk) 80.5 ± 10.6a 56.7 ± 10.9 52.4 ± 13.7 50.1 ± 14.1 aP < .01 C versus LS-IDDM
C versus ND-IDDM

ASO (U/mL) 0.2 ± 0.04a 1.5 ± 0.3 2.0 ± 0.5 1.3 ± 0.4* aP < .01 C versus LS-IDDM
C versus ND-IDDM
P < .05 ND-IDDM
(BT versus AT)

CRP (mg/L) 0.3 ± 0.04 0.9 ± 0.2 1.3 ± 0.4a 0.9 ± 0.3 aP < .05 ND-IDDM versus C
ND- IDDM versus
LS-IDDM

WBC (/mm3) 7745 ± 1412 12126 ± 3611a 9294 ± 1647 8548 ± 1593 aP < .05 LS-IDDM versus C
LS-IDDM versus
ND-IDDM