Table 2.
How particular types of appointment systems were altered in those practices, which reported making changes to patient access management, since the introduction of access targets*
| Appointment system in use or previously in use prior to access target introduction. | Number of practices affected | Mean score of change | Standard deviation of mean score | Skewness | Skewness std. error |
| Telephone Consultations | 28/32 | .36 | .621 | -.407 | .441 |
| Open Surgeries | 5/32 | .00 | .707 | .000 | .913 |
| Pre booked appointments | 28/32 | .21 | .787 | -.411 | .441 |
| Pre booked appointments with more emergency slots | 28/32 | .82 | .390 | -1.775 | .441 |
| Pre booked appointments with more slots held for 48 hour booking | 17/32 | .76 | .434 | -1.3272 | .550 |
| Extra patients | 23/32 | .35 | .573 | -.132 | .481 |
| Telephone triage | 12/32 | .17 | .389 | 2.055 | .637 |
*Practice managers were asked to rate change to individual appointment systems on a scale of -1 to 1.
-1 = appointment system used less or not used in the practice since AT introduction
0 = No change to how appointment system is used in the practice
+1 = Appointment system used more or now used in the practice since AT introduction