Skip to main content
. 2003 Jun 20;139(4):755–764. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705301

Table 2.

Reproductive outcome in the SWV/Fnn mice following administration of 600 mg kg−1 of the valproyltaurine derivatives at GD 8.5

Compound Litters (N) Implants (N) Resorptions (N) (%) Live births (N) Malformed (N) (%)
VTA 10 132 11 (8) 121 0
VTD 9 108 27 (25)** 81 0
M-VTDa 9 116 6 (5) 110 1 (0.9)
DM-VTD 9 130 45 (35)** 85 14 (17)**
I-VTD 8 104 23 (22)** 81 6 (7)**
VPA (in H2O)b 10 120 5 (4) 115 59 (82)**
VPA (in CEL)a 12 152 3d (2) 119 89 (75)**
VPA (in H2O)a 18 237 50b (21) 181 109 (60)**
CEL controla 10 120 5 (4) 115 0
CEL controla 16 212 14f (7) 196 0
H2O controla 12 152 3 (2) 146 0
VGDc 15 178 1 (1) 177 0
VGAc 7 97 6 (6) 91 1 (1)
VPAc 13 148 13 (9) 135 99 (73)**
H2O controlc 8 123 1 (1) 122 0
a

Control for M-VTD treatment group

b

control for all other groups except M-VTD

c

VPA and H2O respective controls

d

Three stillborn fetuses

e

six stillborn fetuses

f

three stillborn fetuses

**

Significantly different from the respective vehicle-treated control group, P<0.05. VTA–valproyltaurine, VTD–valproyltaurinamide, M-VTD–N-methyl-valproyltaurinamide, DM-VTD–N,N-dimethyl-valproyltaurinamide, I-VTD–N-isopropyl valproyltaurinamide, VPA–valproic acid, CEL–cremophor EL.