Skip to main content
. 2003 Aug 11;140(1):61–70. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705401

Table 4.

N/OFQ(1–13)–NH2 and [F/G]N/OFQ(1–13)–NH2 stimulation of GTPγ35S binding and inhibition of cAMP formation in CHOINDhNOP membranes and cells respectively, induced for 20 h with 1, 2, 5, 10 μM ponasterone A

    GTPγ35S cAMP
Induction (Ponasterone A) pEC50/Emax N/OFQ(1–13)NH2 pEC50/Emax [F/G](1–13)NH2 N/OFQ(1–13)NH2/[F/G](1–13)NH2 pEC50/Emax N/OFQ(1–13)NH2 pEC50/Emax [F/G](1–13)NH2 N/OFQ(1–13)NH2/[F/G](1–13)NH2
1 μM 8.12±0.32 Not analysable Not analysable Not analysable
  1.28±0.03          
2 μM 8.68±0.11 7.23±0.38   9.42±0.49 8.26±0.87  
  1.93±0.20 1.51±0.15 0.55 40.9±2.2 19.6±4.8 0.48
5 μM 8.52±0.06 7.68±0.10   9.72±0.40 8.99±0.18  
  4.33±0.80 2.01±0.23 0.30 79.5±4.1 59.37±5.8 0.75
10 μM 8.60±0.07 7.72±0.06   10.35±0.22 8.32±0.13  
  6.95±1.05 3.21±0.38 0.37 86.0±3.7 83.23±4.0 0.97

Data are mean±s.e.m. for n⩾3 experiments. pEC50 values for N/OFQ(1–13)–NH2 and [F/G](1–13)–NH2 did not differ (P>0.05, ANOVA). There was a ponasterone concentration-dependent increase in Emax for N/OFQ(1–13)–NH2 and [F/G](1–13)–NH2 (P<0.05, ANOVA).