Skip to main content
. 2004 Jan 12;141(3):423–430. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705637

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Effects of i.t. administration of BAM22 on the nocifensive response to an intraplantar injection of formalin. (a) and (b) show the time course of the effects of BAM22 (1.5 and 5 nmol) on flinching (a) and lifting/licking (b) evoked by 2.5% formalin. Saline or drug was administered i.t. 10 min before the formalin injection. The number of flinches and the time spent lifting/licking per 5 min were plotted. Each data point and error bar represent the group mean±s.e.m. (c) and (d) are the histograms representing formalin-induced nocifensive behaviors, summed as the number of flinches (c) and time spent lifting licking (d). The data are presented as group means±s.e.m. averaged over the first (0–10 min) and second (15–60 min) phases. The second phase was further divided into early (15–40 min) and later (40–60 min) periods. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001, compared with the response of saline-treated rats (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison post hoc test).