Skip to main content
. 2006 Sep 12;6:13. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-6-13

Table 3.

Risk of breast cancer associated with HRT: Ever- use vs. never use of HRT.

e-case1 e-ctrl.1 Crude OR (95% CI) Adj. OR (95% CI)
Ever HRT 1492 3142 1.1 (0.99–1.2) 1.2 (1.0–1.3)
Duration of use2
<2 yrs 387 770 1.3 (1.1–1.5) 1.3 (1.1–1.6)
2–4 yrs 223 670 0.8 (0.7–0.9) 0.9 (0.7–1.1)
5–7 yrs 278 609 1.0 (0.9–1.2) 1.1 (0.9–1.3)
8+ yrs 604 1093 1.2 (1.0–1.4) 1.2 (1.1–1.4)
Time since first use2 P trend = .08 P trend = .06
1–4 yrs 514 1187 1.1 (0.97–1.3) 1.2 (1.1–1.4)
5–9 yrs 556 1098 1.1 (0.98–1.3) 1.2 (1.0–1.4)
10–14 yrs 294 599 1.0 (0.9–1.2) 0.97 (0.8–1.2)
15+ yrs 128 258 1.1 (0.9–1.4) 0.96 (0.7–1.3)
Time since last use2 P trend = .19 P trend = .51
-1 yr/current use 1381 2908 1.1 (0.99–1.2) 1.2 (1.0–1.3)
1–2 yrs 71 162 0.96 (0.7–1.3) 0.9 (0.6–1.3)
3–4 yrs 31 63 1.0 (0.6–1.6) 1.1 (0.6–1.9)
5+ yrs 9 9 1.7 (0.6–4.3) 2.3 (0.7–7.2)
P trend = .14 P trend = .054

Conditional logistic regression analysis [Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals]; adjustment for BMI, family history of breast cancer, childbearing history, age at first live birth, duration of breast-feeding, age at menarche, ever OC use, education. Index dates 0.5 = exposure information was not considered 0.5 year prior to cancer diagnosis.

1 e-case, e-ctrl = number of observations for exposed case or exposed control respectively.

2 time variables were rounded