Skip to main content
. 2004 May 17;142(3):501–508. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705788

Table 1.

Influence of sodium substitutes on 5-HT-induced [14C]guanidinium influx in N1E-115 cells

    Response to 5-HT
  n pEC50±s.e.m. Emax±s.e.m.
    (mean EC50; μM) (% of reference)
Sodium (135 mM) 12 5.89±0.09 (1.3) 58.3±6.2
Sodium : choline 5 5.22±0.02* (6.0) 60.4±1.4
(118.3 : 16.9 mM)
Sodium:choline 5 4.89±0.07* (12.3) 66.5±2.0
(101.3 : 33.8 mM)
Sodium : choline 5 4.62±0.07* (24.5) 79.9±4.5*
(67.5 : 67.5 mM)
Choline (135 mM) 9 4.33±0.01* (44.7) 110.2±3.1*
Lithium (135 mM) 4 5.69±0.09 (2.3) 40.6±1.9*
TMA (135 mM) 7 4.73±0.01* (19.1) 108.8±5.4*
Tris (135 mM) 7 5.58±0.02* (3.6) 97.7±6.2*
NMDG (135 mM) 8 5.95±0.01 (1.3) 93.4±7.8*

The pEC50 and Emax values of 5-HT (2 min exposure to each concentration) under the cation conditions indicated were calculated from the concentration–response curves shown in Figures 2 and 3. The respective maximal responses (Emax) are expressed as percentages of the effect elicited by 100 μM 5-HT using choline (135 mM) buffer (=reference effect). Shown are means±s.e.m.

*

Significantly different from pEC50 and Emax at 135 mM sodium.