Skip to main content
. 2004 Oct 4;143(5):573–580. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705978

Table 3.

Effects of carcinine on the learning deficit induced by scopolamine (1 mg kg−1) as evaluated by passive avoidance test in mice

Drug Dose Training trial Test trial
Saline+saline 8.0±4.3 288.0±36.0
Scopolamine+saline 1 mg kg−1, i.p. 8.2±3.5 56.6±29.5**
Scopolamine+thioperamine 10 mg kg−1, i.p. 9.2±4.2 216.7±62.8#
Scopolamine+carcinine 5 mg kg−1, i.p. 7.8±3.3 75.6±27.6
  10 mg kg−1, i.p. 6.9±3.0 105.8±38.8
  20 mg kg−1, i.p. 7.2±4.4 156.6±70.2#
Scopolamine+carcinine 20 mg kg−1, i.p.    
+(R)-α-methylhistamine 1 μg, i.c.v. 8.0±2.6 108.3±47.1
  2 μg, i.c.v. 7.7±2.9 58.9±24.7&
  5 μg, i.c.v. 8.2±3.5 32.1±14.2&&
Scopolamine+carcinine 20 mg kg−1, i.p.    
+α-fluoromethylhistidine 10 mg kg−1, i.p. 10.6±4.5 80.6±43.7
  20 mg kg−1, i.p. 9.3±3.3 50.0±29.8&

Each value is expressed as the mean±s.d. of 15 to 18 rats.

**

P<0.01 represents statistically significant difference as compared to the saline+saline control group.

#

P<0.05 represents statistically significant difference as compared to the scopolamine+saline group.

&

P<0.05

&&

P<0.01 represent statistically significant difference as compared to the scopolamine+carcinine (20 mg kg−1)-treated group.