Skip to main content
. 2005 Jul 25;146(3):408–418. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706349

Table 2.

Effect of neonatal capsaicin treatment on brain measurements of male and female rats

  Capsaicin Vehicle Significance of capsaicin treatment
Brain measurement Male Female Male Female  
Cross-sectional area (mm2)          
 2.70 81.69±2.54 81.31±3.28 84.68±3.28 83.09±2.54  
 1.20 97.47±2.30 99.72±2.97 102.58±2.97 103.51±2.30 *
 −1.60 119.61±2.65 123.74±3.43 132.99±3.43 130.39±2.65 *
 −2.56 127.06±3.19 126.12±4.11 126.27±4.11 132.25±3.19 *
 −3.60 125.30±3.72 123.54±4.81 139.65±4.81 135.68±3.72 **
 −5.80 116.41±4.31 110.72±5.56 127.09±5.56 128.44±4.31 *
           
Cortical thickness (mm)          
 1.20 2.15±0.07 2.06±0.06 2.35±0.07 2.16±0.05 *
 −1.60 1.72±0.06 1.82±0.05 1.79±0.06 1.72±0.04  
 −2.56 1.55±0.07 1.55±0.06 1.65±0.07 1.65±0.05  
 −3.60 1.40±0.04 1.50±0.04 1.62±0.04 1.50±0.03 *
 −5.80 1.27±0.04 1.29±0.04 1.41±0.04 1.40±0.03 ***
           
Ventricle area (mm2)          
 1.20 0.54±0.09 0.38±0.07 0.47±0.08 0.32±0.07  
 −1.60 0.97±0.21 1.15±0.17 0.82±0.18 0.58±0.17 *
 −2.56 0.40±0.09 0.51±0.07 0.53±0.08 0.52±0.07  
           
Hippocampal area (mm2)          
 −2.56 10.05±1.07 8.73±0.96 8.86±0.96 7.83±0.96  
 −3.60 12.494±1.20 10.59±1.08 14.97±1.08 13.96±1.08 *
           
Corpus callosum thickness (mm)          
 1.20 0.90±0.03## 0.88±0.02 1.09±0.04 0.98±0.03 ***
 −1.60 0.94±0.04# 0.83±0.03 1.06±0.05 0.84±0.04  
 −2.56 0.77±0.04 0.66±0.04 0.86±0.06 0.73±0.04  
           
Corpus callosum width (mm)          
 1.20 3.36±0.09 3.43±0.08 3.44±0.18 3.51±0.09  
 −1.60 2.32±0.10 2.50±0.09 2.68±0.19 2.43±0.10  
 −2.56 2.43±0.06 2.50±0.05 2.58±0.11 2.58±0.06  
           
Aqueduct (mm2)          
 −5.80 0.18±0.02 0.15±0.02 0.09±0.02 0.08±0.02 *

Brain levels are mm from Bregma (see text and Figure 1 for description of measurements). Values shown are means±s.e.m. obtained from five rats. Asterisks show the overall significance of capsaicin treatment, ***P<0.001; **P<0.01; *P<0.05. Hatches show the significance of capsaicin treatment on male rats for comparisons where there was a significant effect of gender, ##P<0.01; #P<0.05.