Skip to main content
. 2000 Feb 18;97(5):2320–2325. doi: 10.1073/pnas.040554297

Table 1.

Statistical comparisons of MWM spatial performances of the experimental groups

Group effect
Session effect
Interaction
Freedom degrees F value P Freedom degrees F value P Freedom degrees F value P
6 × 10 ANOVAs [group (O+H, Controls, Retention, H, OH+H, H+O) × session]
Findings 5,36 36.91 0.0000 9,324 1.42 n.s. 45,324 2.33 0.0000
Latencies 5,36 45.16 0.0000 9,324 6.96 0.0000 45,324 2.86 0.0000
Scores 5,36 41.36 0.0000 9,324 6.99 0.0000 45,324 3.00 0.0000










3 × 10 ANOVAs [group (O+H, Controls, Retention) × session]
Findings 2,17 7.87 0.0038 9,153 9.86 0.0000 18,153 5.47 0.0000
Latencies 2,17 7.64 0.0043 9,153 22.25 0.0000 18,153 6.42 0.0000
Scores 2,17 2.31 n.s. 9,153 12.27 0.0000 18,153 3.54 0.0000










3 × 10 ANOVAs [group (H, OH+H, H+O) × session]
Findings 2,19 0.01 n.s. 9,171 0.90 n.s. 18,171 2.25 0.0038
Latencies 2,19 0.31 n.s. 9,171 0.70 n.s. 18,171 1.95 0.0145
Scores 2,19 0.71 n.s. 9,171 0.56 n.s. 18,171 1.96 0.0139










2 × 10 ANOVAs [group (O+H, H) × session]
Findings 1,11 32.52 0.0001 9,99 1.66 n.s. 9,99 2.44 0.0149
Latencies 1,11 31.65 0.0002 9,99 4.30 0.0001 9,99 4.74 0.0000
Scores 1,11 28.43 0.0002 9,99 4.49 0.0001 9,99 4.59 0.0000

n.s., not significant.