Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1993 May;102(1):287–293. doi: 10.1104/pp.102.1.287

The Anti-nptII Gene (A Potential Negative Selectable Marker for Plants).

C Xiang 1, D J Guerra 1
PMCID: PMC158774  PMID: 12231820

Abstract

An efficient negative selection procedure is crucial to the isolation of rare homologous recombinants in gene targeting. Although gene targeting is a common practice in lower eukaryotes and is becoming routine in mammals, its application to plants has not been achieved. In this report, we have evaluated an antisense construct against the neomycin phosphotransferase gene (nptII) as a negative selectable marker. The anti-nptII gene construct was able to suppress nptII expression both transiently and in transformed tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) calli. A construct was made which includes both a hygromycin-resistance gene and the sense plus antisense genes for neomycin phosphotransferase. Hygromy-cin-resistant calli were obtained after Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Subsequently, hygromycin-resistant calli were tested for kanamycin sensitivity. The growth on kanamycin medium of calli harboring both the sense and antisense gene constructs was retarded, whereas that of control calli transformed with only the sense nptII gene was not inhibited. Southern blot analysis confirmed the presence of both nptII and anti-nptII genes. Northern blot analyses revealed that antisense transcripts of the nptII gene were made and that the level of sense transcripts was greatly reduced in transgenic calli. These results suggest that the anti-nptII gene could potentially be used as a negative selectable marker for gene targeting in plants.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bradley A., Hasty P., Davis A., Ramirez-Solis R. Modifying the mouse: design and desire. Biotechnology (N Y) 1992 May;10(5):534–539. doi: 10.1038/nbt0592-534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Capecchi M. R. Altering the genome by homologous recombination. Science. 1989 Jun 16;244(4910):1288–1292. doi: 10.1126/science.2660260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chisaka O., Capecchi M. R. Regionally restricted developmental defects resulting from targeted disruption of the mouse homeobox gene hox-1.5. Nature. 1991 Apr 11;350(6318):473–479. doi: 10.1038/350473a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Czako M., An G. Expression of DNA coding for diphtheria toxin chain a is toxic to plant cells. Plant Physiol. 1991 Mar;95(3):687–692. doi: 10.1104/pp.95.3.687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Delauney A. J., Tabaeizadeh Z., Verma D. P. A stable bifunctional antisense transcript inhibiting gene expression in transgenic plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jun;85(12):4300–4304. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.12.4300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Donehower L. A., Harvey M., Slagle B. L., McArthur M. J., Montgomery C. A., Jr, Butel J. S., Bradley A. Mice deficient for p53 are developmentally normal but susceptible to spontaneous tumours. Nature. 1992 Mar 19;356(6366):215–221. doi: 10.1038/356215a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Halfter U., Morris P. C., Willmitzer L. Gene targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genet. 1992 Jan;231(2):186–193. doi: 10.1007/BF00279790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hasty P., Ramírez-Solis R., Krumlauf R., Bradley A. Introduction of a subtle mutation into the Hox-2.6 locus in embryonic stem cells. Nature. 1991 Mar 21;350(6315):243–246. doi: 10.1038/350243a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hilson P., Dewulf J., Delporte F., Installé P., Jacquemin J. M., Jacobs M., Negrutiu I. Yeast RAS2 affects cell viability, mitotic division and transient gene expression in Nicotiana species. Plant Mol Biol. 1990 May;14(5):669–685. doi: 10.1007/BF00016500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Izant J. G., Weintraub H. Constitutive and conditional suppression of exogenous and endogenous genes by anti-sense RNA. Science. 1985 Jul 26;229(4711):345–352. doi: 10.1126/science.2990048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Izant J. G., Weintraub H. Inhibition of thymidine kinase gene expression by anti-sense RNA: a molecular approach to genetic analysis. Cell. 1984 Apr;36(4):1007–1015. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90050-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jeannotte L., Ruiz J. C., Robertson E. J. Low level of Hox1.3 gene expression does not preclude the use of promoterless vectors to generate a targeted gene disruption. off. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Nov;11(11):5578–5585. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.11.5578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lee K. Y., Lund P., Lowe K., Dunsmuir P. Homologous recombination in plant cells after Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Plant Cell. 1990 May;2(5):415–425. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.5.415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lyznik L. A., McGee J. D., Tung P. Y., Bennetzen J. L., Hodges T. K. Homologous recombination between plasmid DNA molecules in maize protoplasts. Mol Gen Genet. 1991 Nov;230(1-2):209–218. doi: 10.1007/BF00290670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mombaerts P., Clarke A. R., Hooper M. L., Tonegawa S. Creation of a large genomic deletion at the T-cell antigen receptor beta-subunit locus in mouse embryonic stem cells by gene targeting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Apr 15;88(8):3084–3087. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.8.3084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Müller-Röber B., Sonnewald U., Willmitzer L. Inhibition of the ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase in transgenic potatoes leads to sugar-storing tubers and influences tuber formation and expression of tuber storage protein genes. EMBO J. 1992 Apr;11(4):1229–1238. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05167.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Oeller P. W., Lu M. W., Taylor L. P., Pike D. A., Theologis A. Reversible inhibition of tomato fruit senescence by antisense RNA. Science. 1991 Oct 18;254(5030):437–439. doi: 10.1126/science.1925603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Offringa R., de Groot M. J., Haagsman H. J., Does M. P., van den Elzen P. J., Hooykaas P. J. Extrachromosomal homologous recombination and gene targeting in plant cells after Agrobacterium mediated transformation. EMBO J. 1990 Oct;9(10):3077–3084. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07504.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Paszkowski J., Baur M., Bogucki A., Potrykus I. Gene targeting in plants. EMBO J. 1988 Dec 20;7(13):4021–4026. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03295.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Peterhans A., Schlüpmann H., Basse C., Paszkowski J. Intrachromosomal recombination in plants. EMBO J. 1990 Nov;9(11):3437–3445. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07551.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Platt S. G., Yang N. S. Dot assay for neomycin phosphotransferase activity in crude cell extracts. Anal Biochem. 1987 May 1;162(2):529–535. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90429-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sanders P. R., Winter J. A., Barnason A. R., Rogers S. G., Fraley R. T. Comparison of cauliflower mosaic virus 35S and nopaline synthase promoters in transgenic plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Feb 25;15(4):1543–1558. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.4.1543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Saunders J. A., Smith C. R., Kaper J. M. Effects of electroporation pulse wave on the incorporation of viral RNA into tobacco protoplasts. Biotechniques. 1989 Nov-Dec;7(10):1124–1131. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schardl C. L., Byrd A. D., Benzion G., Altschuler M. A., Hildebrand D. F., Hunt A. G. Design and construction of a versatile system for the expression of foreign genes in plants. Gene. 1987;61(1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90359-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Takayama K. M., Inouye M. Antisense RNA. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 1990;25(3):155–184. doi: 10.3109/10409239009090608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Thomas K. R., Capecchi M. R. Site-directed mutagenesis by gene targeting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells. Cell. 1987 Nov 6;51(3):503–512. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90646-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. To R. Y., Booth S. C., Neiman P. E. Inhibition of retroviral replication by anti-sense RNA. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Dec;6(12):4758–4762. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.12.4758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tomizawa J., Itoh T. Plasmid ColE1 incompatibility determined by interaction of RNA I with primer transcript. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Oct;78(10):6096–6100. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.10.6096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. van der Krol A. R., Mol J. N., Stuitje A. R. Modulation of eukaryotic gene expression by complementary RNA or DNA sequences. Biotechniques. 1988 Nov-Dec;6(10):958–976. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES