Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2006 Oct 6.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Detect Prev. 2002;26(1):33–41. doi: 10.1016/S0361-090X(02)00013-2

Table 5.

Multiple logistic regression results, modeling mammography screening stages of adoption (N = 237)

Relapse odds ratioa (95% CI) Action odds ratioa (95% CI) Maintenance odds ratioa (95% CI)
MD characteristicsb (P < 0.001)
 Asian American female 12.9 (1.4, 118.2) 22.6 (2.5, 208.2) 74.7 (8.3, 674.6)
 Non-Asian female 4.1 (1.5, 11.2) 1.5 (0.5, 4.8) 6.5 (2.1, 20.3)
 Non-Asian male 2.9 (1.0, 8.2) 3.8 (1.3, 10.7) 12.1 (4.1, 35.9)
 No MD 4.5 (1.2, 17.7) 1.8 (0.4, 8.4) 6.0 (1.3, 27.1)
Believe cancer is curable (P = 0.029) 0.6 (0.3, 1.2) 2.1 (0.9, 4.6) 1.3 (0.6, 2.8)
Health insurancec (P = 0.042)
 Public 2.4 (0.7, 8.8) 0.8 (0.2, 2.4) 1.0 (0.3, 3.3)
 Private 0.4 (0.1, 2.9) 1.7 (0.4, 7.3) 0.6 (0.1, 2.9)
≥10 years in US (P = 0.015) 5.2 (1.6, 16.8) 2.2 (0.8, 6.5) 4.1 (1.3, 13.3)
a

Relative to women in the precontemplation/contemplation stage; odds ratios in bold are significant at the 5% level.

b

Relative to Asian American male MD.

c

Relative to no health insurance. Overall P-value.