Skip to main content
. 2006 Sep;86(2):181–195. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.108.05

Fig 3. Phase 2.

Fig 3

Mean percent choice (and standard deviation) of the larger-dose alternative as a function of the FR programmed on that alternative. The response requirement associated with the smaller-dose alternative was one-third that of the larger-dose alternative. Circles represent comparisons employing 0.3 and 0.1 µg/kg/inj. Squares represent comparisons employing 0.9 and 0.3 µg/kg/inj.