Skip to main content
. 2006 Oct;19(4):708–727. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00011-06

TABLE 1.

Prevalences of coinfections of Ixodes ticks with Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, and Babesia microti/divergens by species and geographic region as determined by PCRa

Region Reference Ixodes species No. of ticks sampled (population)b % Infectionc with:
% Coinfectiond with:
B. burgdorferie A. phagocytophiluma B. microti or B. divergensf Two pathogens Three pathogens
North America
    California Holden et al. (86) I. pacificus 776 (a) 6.7 7.2 1.0
    California Lane et al. (109) I. pacificus 158 (n) 3.8 3.2 1.3
    Maine Holman et al. (88) I. scapularis 394 (a, n) 22.3 2.8 0.8 1.0 0
    Massachusetts Piesman et al. (155) I. scapularis 395 (n) 27.3 23.0 10.9
    Massachusetts Telford et al. (206) I. scapularis 51 (a) 36.0 11.0 9.0 4.0 0
    New Jersey Adelson et al. (1) I. scapularis 107 33.6 1.9 8.4 3.7 0
    New Jersey Schulze et al. (174) I. scapularis 147 (a) 50.3 6.1 2.7
    New Jersey Varde et al. (213) I. scapularis 100 (a) 43.0 17.0 5.0 10 0
    New York Schauber et al. (170) I. scapularis 188 (a) 66.0 42.6 28.2
    New York (1995) Schwartz et al. (175) I. scapularis 100 (a) 52.0 53 26
73 (n) 26.0 21 5
    New York (1984) I. scapularis 100 (a) 45.0 32 19
    Pennsylvania Courtney et al. (46) I. scapularis 454 (a) 41.2 17.8 3.5
    Wisconsin Pancholi et al. (147) I. scapularis 89 (a) 11.2 7.9 2.2
Europe
    Bulgaria Christova et al. (41) I. ricinus 112 (a) 32.1 33.9 13.4
    France Halos et al. (77) I. ricinus 92 (a, n) 3.3 20.6g 2.1g
    Germany Baumgarten et al. (17) I. ricinus 275 (a) 21.8 2.2 0.7
    Germany Fingerle et al. (68) I. ricinus 401 (a) 37.4 2.0 1.0
91 (n) 30.8 0 0
    Germany Hildebrandt et al. (83) I. ricinus 62 (a) 21.0 6.5 1.6
243 (n) 8.6 1.2 0.4
    Germany Oehme et al. (141) I. ricinus 898 20.4 2.9 0.8
    Italy Cinco et al. (44) I. ricinus 86 (a, n) 19.8 24.4 8.1
    The Netherlands Schouls et al. (173) I. ricinus 121 13.0 28.9 3.3
    Poland Skotarczak et al. (180) I. ricinus 550 (a) 12.2 12.5 1.8
1,160 (n) 5.8 9.5 0.2
385 (l) 5.5 4.2 0
    Poland Skotarczak et al. (179) I. ricinus 280 (a) 25.0 10.0 19.3 5.4 1.1
234 (n) 11.5 4.3 11.1 0.8 0
19 (l) 42.1 0 21.0 0 0
    Poland Stánczak et al. (189) I. ricinus 424 (a) 11.6 19.2 5.0
    Poland Stánczak et al. (188) I. ricinus 303 (a) 19.5 29.7 3.6 10.6 0
    Russia Alekseev et al. (6) I. persulcatus 1,282 (a) 29.9 1.0 0.9 1.2h 0i
    Slovakia Derdáková et al. (54) I. ricinus 40 (a) 45.0 20.0 7.5
    Switzerland Leutenegger et al. (111) I. ricinus 20 (n) 40.0 0 0
100 (a) 49.0 2.0 2.0
China Cao et al. (37) I. persulcatus 1,146 (a) 37.3 4.9 0.5
199 (n) 13.6 3.0 0.5
a

PCR assays differ among studies, and results might include strain variants (e.g., A. phagocytophilum) that are potentially nonpathogenic in humans. Microscopy-based detection of infection in ticks occurs in older studies.

b

a, adults; n, nymphs; l, larvae.

c

Prevalence includes totals from coinfected ticks.

d

Coinfection data overlap with the single-pathogen prevalence percentages.

e

B. burgdorferi sensu lato genogroup; European and Asian studies include pathogenic Borrelia species, Borrelia garinii, and Borrelia afzelii.

f

Babesia odocoilei, not reported to cause human disease, has since been demonstrated to be prevalent among I. scapularis ticks in certain locations in the northeastern and north central United States (9, 172). I. ricinus ticks in Europe can also carry species of Babesia that are neither B. microti nor B. divergens (59). Thus, estimates of pathogen prevalence based solely on microscopy or using nonspecific assays may overestimate the risk of human babesiosis.

g

Particular species of Babesia not determined.

h

Dual coinfection with TBE virus and B. burgdorferi sensu lato was demonstrated for 15 (1.2%) of 1,280 I. persulcatus ticks.

i

Triple coinfection with B. microti, B. burgdorferi, and TBE virus was demonstrated for a single (0.1%) tick.