Skip to main content
. 2006 Oct;19(4):708–727. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00011-06

TABLE 2.

Prevalences of reported coinfections of humans with Borrelia burgdorferi (LD), HA, and babesiosis by geographic region

Region Study population characteristics Reference No. tested Method of determinationa
No. (%) with:
LD Babesia HA LD + babesiosis LD + HA HA + babesiosis Triple coinfection
North America LD patients
    California     LD patients screened for Babesia strain WA-1 Stricker et al. (199) 255 S 60 (24)
    Connecticut     LD-seropositive persons Krause et al. (105) 735 S S f (9.5)
    Connecticut     LD-seropositive patients with EM rash Magnarelli et al. (117) 40 S S S 3 (8) 3 (8)
    Connecticut, Rhode Island     Persons with positive IgM titers for B. burgdorferi De Martino et al. (50) 34 S S 7 (21)
    Connecticut, Rhode Island     Patients diagnosed with LD Krause et al. (106) 240 PCR, S PCR, S 26 (11)
    Connecticut, Rhode Island     4-yr prospective study of patients with culture-proven EM rash Steere et al. (194) 93 C PCR, S PCR, S 2 (2) 2 (2) 0 0
    Nantucket Island     LD patients according to CDC surveillance case definition Wang et al. (217) 171 D, S M, S 37 (22)
    New York     LD-seropositive persons Aguero-Rosenfeld et al. (3) 175 S S 45 (26)
    LD patients with culture-confirmed EM 42 C S 9 (21)
    New York     LD patients from areas of Babesia endemicity Benach et al. (22) 30 S S 20 (67)
    Wisconsin, Minnesota     Patients with EM and laboratory-confirmation of LD Mitchell et al. (128) 96 C, S S S 2 (2) 5 (5) 2 (2)
HA patients
    Wisconsin, Minnesota     HA patients positive by PCR Mitchell et al. (128) 19 S S PCR 1 (5) 1 (5) 1 (5)
    Wisconsin     Patients with HA or LD Belongia et al. (20) 121 S M, PCR, S 11 (9)
    Wisconsin     HA patients identified through active surveillance Belongia et al. (19) 142 S S M, PCR, S 7 (5) 7/102 (7)
Other tick-borne illness
    Connecticut, Nantucket Island, Rhode Island     Symptomatic patients with laboratory evidence of >1 tick-borne pathogen Krause et al. (104) 192b PCR, S M, PCR, S M, PCR, S 61 (32) 7 (4) 3 (2) 4 (2)
    Massachusetts, New York     Babesiosis patients Benach et al. (22) 41 S S 14 (34)
Febrile patients
    Connecticut     Febrile patients with tick exposure and leucopenia or thrombocytopenia Magnarelli et al. (118) 375c S S S 22 (6) 15 (4) 2 (0.5) 2 (0.5)
    Wisconsin     Patients with unexplained febrile illness during tick season Belongia et al. (21) 62 S M, S M, PCR, S 0 2 (3) 0 0
    New York Prospective seroincidence: 1-yr study of adults with high-risk exposures Hilton et al. (84) 671 S S S 0 0 0 0
Europe
LD patients
    Bulgaria     Patients with EM rash Christova and Dumler (42) 145 D S 14 (10)
    Norway     Patients with acute LD Bakken et al. (13) 58 D, S S 6 (10)
    Poland     Hospitalized LD patients Hermanowska-Szpakowicz et al. (81) 74 D, PCR, S PCR PCR 0 8 (11) 0 0
    Switzerland     LD-seropositive persons Brouqui et al. (28) 70 S S 12 (17)
    Switzerland     Patients previously diagnosed with LD Pusterla et al. (159)d 149 S S 19 (13)
    United Kingdom     LD-seropositive persons Sumption et al. (202) 40 S S 3 (8)
    Slovenia Other tick-borne illness: febrile pediatric patients with established tick-borne infectione Arnez et al. (10) 28 C, D, S S PCR, S 0 1 (4) 0 0
    Sweden Febrile patients: prospective study of febrile patients following tick exposure Bjöersdorff et al. (24) 27 D, S PCR, S 3 (11)
    Sweden Community serosurvey: permanent residents of Koster Islands of Sweden; seroprevalence of HA (11%) similar to that of LD (14%) Dumler et al. (61) 185 S S 6 (3)
a

C, bacterial culture; D, diagnosed clinically; M, microscopy; PCR, DNA detection; S, serology.

b

A total of 310 participants enrolled with EM rash or influenza-like illness indicative of tick-borne disease; 192 (62%) of 310 had confirmed tick-borne infection. Coinfection was documented for 75 (39%) of 192 subjects.

c

One hundred eighty (48%) of 375 patients tested demonstrated serologic evidence in acute- or convalescent-phase sera of a tick-borne disease; 47 (26.1%) of 180 had antibodies to two or more tick-borne agents..

d

The highest seroprevalence of HA occurred among persons who were seropositive for central European TBE virus (40 of 205 [20%]).

e

Evidence of dual infection with TBE virus and B. burgdorferi sensu lato was found for 4 (14%) of 28 pediatric patients.

f

Specific number not reported by authors.