Skip to main content
British Medical Journal logoLink to British Medical Journal
. 1979 Mar 24;1(6166):805–807. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6166.805

What shall we teach undergraduates?

V Wright, R Hopkins, K E Burton
PMCID: PMC1598428  PMID: 435803

Abstract

The opinions of 600 randomly selected doctors on what should be taught to undergraduates in clinical years were analysed. The respondents gave a high priority to general medicine, paediatrics, general surgery, casualty, and gynaecology, but a low priority to forensic medicine, plastic surgery, radiotherapy, anaesthetics, radiology, and rehabilitation medicine. Doctors thought that these should be taught to postgraduates. The two major groupings of doctors--general practitioners and consultants--gave essentially the same priorities. Undergraduate curricula cannot include all major specialities, so the results of this analysis may provide a useful basis for selecting the most suitable subjects. Criteria for including other specialties might be the ability and enthusiasm of the teachers and well-thought-out and academically sound teaching programmes.

Full text

PDF
805

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Gentles J. C., Evans E. G., Jones G. R. Control of tinea pedis in a swimming bath. Br Med J. 1974 Jun 15;2(5919):577–580. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5919.577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Rawles J. M., Kenmure A. C. Controlled trial of oxygen in uncomplicated myocardial infarction. Br Med J. 1976 May 8;1(6018):1121–1123. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6018.1121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES