Table 3.
Linkage groups (this study) | Linkage groups Thamarus et al. [17] | CSIRO Microsatellites Thamarus et al. [17] | Candidate genes Thamarus et al. [17] | Linkage groups Bundock et al. [44] | CRC Microsatellites Bundock et al. [44] |
1 | 7 | En006, Eg084, Eg065, Eg134, (EMBRA6) | COMT, SAMS (est), Laccase (est) | - | - |
2 | 4a | Eg008, Eg076, Eg111, Eg086, Eg096 | EAP1, PAL | - | - |
3 | 8b | Eg094, Eg098, Eg131 | ECS1 | - | - |
4 | 11g | Eg128, En011, Eg030 | MsaS2 | - | - |
5 | 9 | (EMBRA5) | AGE2 | 3 | EMCRC4, (EMBRA5), (EMBRA9) |
6 | 6c | Eg015b, Eg062, En016, | EXS2 | - | - |
7 | 2d | Eg061, En012, En014 | CCOAOMT, ECA1, XET(est) | 2 | EMCRC9, (EMBRA7) |
8 | 1e | Es076, En013, En015, Eg117, Eg126, En010 | 6 | EMCRC8, (EMBRA3) | |
9 | 5 | Eg067, Eg089, Eg015a, Es140, Eg115 | EXS2, | 1 | EMCRC1, (EMBRA17, EMBRA18) |
10 | 10f | Eg023, Eg091, Es115 | CCR | - | - |
11 | 3 | Eg099, Eg024, (EMBRA2) | 4CL, AGE1, ELF, SAMS (est) | - | - |
a Homology was established based on markers Eg086 and Eg096 mapped by Missiaggia [72]
b Homology was established based on markers Eg094 and Eg098 mapped by Missiaggia [72]
c Homology was established based on marker Eg062 mapped by Missiaggia [72]
d Homology was established based on markers En014 mapped by Missiaggia [72]
e Homology was established based on markers En010 and Eg126 mapped by Missiaggia [72]
f Homology was established based on markers Eg091 mapped by Missiaggia [72]
g Homology was established based on the fact that only linkage group 4 of this work and group 11 of Thamarus et al. [17] were left.