Table 1.
CaMs | Designed positions |
|||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Site 1 |
Site 2 |
Site 3 |
Site 4 |
|||||||||||||||||
20 | 22 | 24 | 27 | 31 | 56 | 58 | 60 | 62 | 67 | 93 | 95 | 97 | 100 | 104 | 129 | 131 | 133 | 135 | 140 | |
CaM WT | D | D | D | I | E | D | D | N | T | E | D | D | N | I | E | D | D | D | Q | E |
CaM-CWT | T | K | Q | I | E | S | D | E | I | K | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
CaM-NWT | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | A | R | D | M | E | R | D | N | E | N |
All CaM residues that directly coordinate Ca2+ ions with their side chains (positions 20, 22, 24, 31, 56, 58, 60, and 67 for the N-terminal domain and 93, 95, 97, 104, 129, 131, 133, and 140 for the C-terminal domain) were included in the optimization. Residues 62 and 135 also were included because they coordinate Ca2+ ions with their backbone carbonyls. Residues 27 and 100, which do not coordinate Ca2+ ions, but are in close proximity to the ion and help define the Ca2+-binding loop, also were optimized. Bold lettering shows mutations with respect to the WT CaM sequence. –, positions were not included in the calculation for the mutant CaM indicated.