Skip to main content
. 2006 Jun;8(6):477–487. doi: 10.1593/neo.06115

Table 2.

Pharmacokinetics of FU in C38 and C26a Tumors.

CFU (a.u.) tuptake (min) t1/2 (min) Average of All Measured FU Resonance Integrals in Time (a.u.)
C38 control (n = 10) 1603 ± 96.9* 0.94 ± 0.35 72.99 ± 8.69 929.0 ± 55.3§
C38 carbogen (n = 9) 2223 ± 85.5 0.71 ± 0.20 65.16 ± 4.63 1223 ± 82.2#
C26a control (n = 7) 581.2 ± 37.6 2.30 ± 0.48 33.17 ± 2.56 192.9 ± 23.6
C26a carbogen (n = 10) 665.3 ± 31.3 0.54 ± 0.22** 33.00 ± 2.12 231.6 ± 31.2

The mean of the maximum concentration of FU (CFU), the doubling time of FU resonance integral increase in the tumor (tuptake), the half-life of FU in the tumor (t1/2), and the average of all resonance integrals (average FU resonance integral) ± SEM are shown for C38 and C26a tumors. Values are calculated from a fit of the mean resonance integral of all mice per group to a biexponential equation (see the Materials and Methods section).

*

P < .0001, compared with the C26a control group.

P < .05, compared with the C26a control group.

P < .01, compared with the C26a control group.

§

P < .0001, compared with the C26a control group.

P < .001, compared with the C38 control group.

#

P < .001, compared with the C38 control group.

**

P < .01, compared with the C26a control group.