Skip to main content
. 2005 Apr;166(4):1099–1108. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62330-9

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Visualization of Fas and FasL in skin biopsies from CL. a: Fas expression in epidermis was visualized using diaminobenzidine (brown) and counterstained with hematoxylin. Sections were incubated with an isotype control (IgG) to detect background or with an anti-Fas monoclonal (clone DX2). In active CL Fas is highly expressed on the keratinocytes in superficial epidermis. In healing CL less and more even expression of Fas was noted. As a comparison, the keratinocyte expression of Fas in healthy skin was evaluated and showed a similar pattern to healing CL. Both active and healing CL show hypertropic epidermis (E) compared to healthy skin. Dermis (D) contains inflammatory cells and fibrosis in the active and healing lesion. b: FasL was visualized using Cy3 (red). FasL-expressing cells were mainly present in aggregations of up to 30 cells/group. The FasL cells were only present in the dermis, both adjacent to the epidermis and in deep dermis. A few FasL-positive cells were found in one of the controls (control 3). More FasL-positive cells were found in active lesions compared to healing lesions. Virtually no FasL-positive cells were present in healthy skin. c: T cells (green) were visualized using rabbit anti-CD3 in combination with goat anti-rabbit (Alexa, green). FasL-positive cells (red) were found in areas of both CD3-positive and -negative cells (FasL+CD3+ area shown). d: Macrophages (green) were visualized by incubating the sections with a FITC-conjugated mouse anti-CD68 after FasL staining (red) had been performed. FasL-positive cells were found in both CD68+ and CD68 cells (FasL+CD68+ area shown). Original magnifications: ×10 (a); ×40 (b).

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure