Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Plant Cell logoLink to The Plant Cell
. 1993 Sep;5(9):1049–1062. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.9.1049

Positive and negative regulatory regions control the spatial distribution of polygalacturonase transcription in tomato fruit pericarp.

J Montgomery 1, V Pollard 1, J Deikman 1, R L Fischer 1
PMCID: PMC160340  PMID: 8400876

Abstract

The tomato fruit consists of a thick, fleshy pericarp composed predominantly of highly vacuolated parenchymatous cells, which surrounds the seeds. During ripening, the activation of gene expression results in dramatic biochemical and physiological changes in the pericarp. The polygalacturonase (PG) gene, unlike many fruit ripening-induced genes, is not activated by the increase in ethylene hormone concentration associated with the onset of ripening. To investigate ethylene concentration-independent gene transcription in ripe tomato fruit, we analyzed the expression of chimeric PG promoter-beta-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene fusions in transgenic tomato plants. We determined that a 1.4-kb PG promoter directs ripening-regulated transcription in outer pericarp but not in inner pericarp cells, with a sharp boundary of PG promoter activity located midway through the pericarp. Promoter deletion analysis indicated that a minimum of three promoter regions influence the spatial regulation of PG transcription. A positive regulatory region from -231 to -134 promotes gene transcription in the outer pericarp of ripe fruit. A second positive regulatory region from -806 to -443 extends gene activity to the inner pericarp. However, a negative regulatory region from -1411 to -1150 inhibits gene transcription in the inner pericarp. DNase I footprint analysis showed that nuclear proteins in unripe and ripe fruit interact with DNA sequences within each of these three regulatory regions. Thus, temporal and spatial control of PG transcription is mediated by the interaction of negative and positive regulatory promoter elements, resulting in gene activity in the outer pericarp but not the inner pericarp of ripe tomato fruit. The expression pattern of PG suggests that, although they are morphologically similar, there is a fundamental difference between the parenchymatous cells within the inner and outer pericarp.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Benfey P. N., Chua N. H. The Cauliflower Mosaic Virus 35S Promoter: Combinatorial Regulation of Transcription in Plants. Science. 1990 Nov 16;250(4983):959–966. doi: 10.1126/science.250.4983.959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bruce W. B., Deng X. W., Quail P. H. A negatively acting DNA sequence element mediates phytochrome-directed repression of phyA gene transcription. EMBO J. 1991 Oct;10(10):3015–3024. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07852.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bustos M. M., Begum D., Kalkan F. A., Battraw M. J., Hall T. C. Positive and negative cis-acting DNA domains are required for spatial and temporal regulation of gene expression by a seed storage protein promoter. EMBO J. 1991 Jun;10(6):1469–1479. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07667.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bustos M. M., Guiltinan M. J., Jordano J., Begum D., Kalkan F. A., Hall T. C. Regulation of beta-glucuronidase expression in transgenic tobacco plants by an A/T-rich, cis-acting sequence found upstream of a French bean beta-phaseolin gene. Plant Cell. 1989 Sep;1(9):839–853. doi: 10.1105/tpc.1.9.839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cass L. G., Kirven K. A., Christoffersen R. E. Isolation and characterization of a cellulase gene family member expressed during avocado fruit ripening. Mol Gen Genet. 1990 Aug;223(1):76–86. doi: 10.1007/BF00315799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cordes S., Deikman J., Margossian L. J., Fischer R. L. Interaction of a developmentally regulated DNA-binding factor with sites flanking two different fruit-ripening genes from tomato. Plant Cell. 1989 Oct;1(10):1025–1034. doi: 10.1105/tpc.1.10.1025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Czarnecka E., Ingersoll J. C., Gurley W. B. AT-rich promoter elements of soybean heat shock gene Gmhsp17.5E bind two distinct sets of nuclear proteins in vitro. Plant Mol Biol. 1992 Sep;19(6):985–1000. doi: 10.1007/BF00040530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Datta N., Cashmore A. R. Binding of a pea nuclear protein to promoters of certain photoregulated genes is modulated by phosphorylation. Plant Cell. 1989 Nov;1(11):1069–1077. doi: 10.1105/tpc.1.11.1069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. De Block M., Herrera-Estrella L., Van Montagu M., Schell J., Zambryski P. Expression of foreign genes in regenerated plants and in their progeny. EMBO J. 1984 Aug;3(8):1681–1689. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02032.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Deikman J., Fischer R. L. Interaction of a DNA binding factor with the 5'-flanking region of an ethylene-responsive fruit ripening gene from tomato. EMBO J. 1988 Nov;7(11):3315–3320. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03202.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Deikman J., Kline R., Fischer R. L. Organization of Ripening and Ethylene Regulatory Regions in a Fruit-Specific Promoter from Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Plant Physiol. 1992 Dec;100(4):2013–2017. doi: 10.1104/pp.100.4.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dellapenna D., Lincoln J. E., Fischer R. L., Bennett A. B. Transcriptional Analysis of Polygalacturonase and Other Ripening Associated Genes in Rutgers, rin, nor, and Nr Tomato Fruit. Plant Physiol. 1989 Aug;90(4):1372–1377. doi: 10.1104/pp.90.4.1372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Giese K., Cox J., Grosschedl R. The HMG domain of lymphoid enhancer factor 1 bends DNA and facilitates assembly of functional nucleoprotein structures. Cell. 1992 Apr 3;69(1):185–195. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90129-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Giovannoni J. J., DellaPenna D., Bennett A. B., Fischer R. L. Expression of a chimeric polygalacturonase gene in transgenic rin (ripening inhibitor) tomato fruit results in polyuronide degradation but not fruit softening. Plant Cell. 1989 Jan;1(1):53–63. doi: 10.1105/tpc.1.1.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gray J., Picton S., Shabbeer J., Schuch W., Grierson D. Molecular biology of fruit ripening and its manipulation with antisense genes. Plant Mol Biol. 1992 May;19(1):69–87. doi: 10.1007/BF00015607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Grierson D., Tucker G. A., Keen J., Ray J., Bird C. R., Schuch W. Sequencing and identification of a cDNA clone for tomato polygalacturonase. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Nov 11;14(21):8595–8603. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.21.8595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hamilton A. J., Bouzayen M., Grierson D. Identification of a tomato gene for the ethylene-forming enzyme by expression in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Aug 15;88(16):7434–7437. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.16.7434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Henikoff S. Unidirectional digestion with exonuclease III creates targeted breakpoints for DNA sequencing. Gene. 1984 Jun;28(3):351–359. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(84)90153-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jacobsen K., Laursen N. B., Jensen E. O., Marcker A., Poulsen C., Marcker K. A. HMG I-like proteins from leaf and nodule nuclei interact with different AT motifs in soybean nodulin promoters. Plant Cell. 1990 Jan;2(1):85–94. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.1.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jefferson R. A., Kavanagh T. A., Bevan M. W. GUS fusions: beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J. 1987 Dec 20;6(13):3901–3907. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02730.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jofuku K. D., Okamuro J. K., Goldberg R. B. Interaction of an embryo DNA binding protein with a soybean lectin gene upstream region. Nature. 1987 Aug 20;328(6132):734–737. doi: 10.1038/328734a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jordano J., Almoguera C., Thomas T. L. A sunflower helianthinin gene upstream sequence ensemble contains an enhancer and sites of nuclear protein interaction. Plant Cell. 1989 Sep;1(9):855–866. doi: 10.1105/tpc.1.9.855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Levine M., Manley J. L. Transcriptional repression of eukaryotic promoters. Cell. 1989 Nov 3;59(3):405–408. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90024-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lincoln J. E., Cordes S., Read E., Fischer R. L. Regulation of gene expression by ethylene during Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato) fruit development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 May;84(9):2793–2797. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.9.2793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Manzara T., Carrasco P., Gruissem W. Developmental and organ-specific changes in promoter DNA-protein interactions in the tomato rbcS gene family. Plant Cell. 1991 Dec;3(12):1305–1316. doi: 10.1105/tpc.3.12.1305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Oeller P. W., Lu M. W., Taylor L. P., Pike D. A., Theologis A. Reversible inhibition of tomato fruit senescence by antisense RNA. Science. 1991 Oct 18;254(5030):437–439. doi: 10.1126/science.1925603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pedersen T. J., Arwood L. J., Spiker S., Guiltinan M. J., Thompson W. F. High mobility group chromosomal proteins bind to AT-rich tracts flanking plant genes. Plant Mol Biol. 1991 Jan;16(1):95–104. doi: 10.1007/BF00017920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ray J., Moureau P., Bird C., Bird A., Grierson D., Maunders M., Truesdale M., Bramley P., Schuch W. Cloning and characterization of a gene involved in phytoene synthesis from tomato. Plant Mol Biol. 1992 Jun;19(3):401–404. doi: 10.1007/BF00023387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rose R. E., Houck C. M., Monson E. K., DeJesus C. E., Sheehy R. E., Hiatt W. R. The nucleotide sequence of the 5' flanking region of a tomato polygalacturonase gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Jul 25;16(14B):7191–7191. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.14.7191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rottmann W. H., Peter G. F., Oeller P. W., Keller J. A., Shen N. F., Nagy B. P., Taylor L. P., Campbell A. D., Theologis A. 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase in tomato is encoded by a multigene family whose transcription is induced during fruit and floral senescence. J Mol Biol. 1991 Dec 20;222(4):937–961. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90587-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sheehy R. E., Kramer M., Hiatt W. R. Reduction of polygalacturonase activity in tomato fruit by antisense RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Dec;85(23):8805–8809. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.23.8805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Smith C. J., Watson C. F., Morris P. C., Bird C. R., Seymour G. B., Gray J. E., Arnold C., Tucker G. A., Schuch W., Harding S. Inheritance and effect on ripening of antisense polygalacturonase genes in transgenic tomatoes. Plant Mol Biol. 1990 Mar;14(3):369–379. doi: 10.1007/BF00028773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Solomon M. J., Strauss F., Varshavsky A. A mammalian high mobility group protein recognizes any stretch of six A.T base pairs in duplex DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Mar;83(5):1276–1280. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.5.1276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Thanos D., Maniatis T. The high mobility group protein HMG I(Y) is required for NF-kappa B-dependent virus induction of the human IFN-beta gene. Cell. 1992 Nov 27;71(5):777–789. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90554-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Theologis A. One rotten apple spoils the whole bushel: the role of ethylene in fruit ripening. Cell. 1992 Jul 24;70(2):181–184. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90093-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Tieman D. M., Handa A. K. Immunocytolocalization of polygalacturonase in ripening tomato fruit. Plant Physiol. 1989 May;90(1):17–20. doi: 10.1104/pp.90.1.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Van Haute E., Joos H., Maes M., Warren G., Van Montagu M., Schell J. Intergeneric transfer and exchange recombination of restriction fragments cloned in pBR322: a novel strategy for the reversed genetics of the Ti plasmids of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. EMBO J. 1983;2(3):411–417. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1983.tb01438.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Van der Straeten D., Van Wiemeersch L., Goodman H. M., Van Montagu M. Purification and partial characterization of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase from tomato pericarp. Eur J Biochem. 1989 Jul 1;182(3):639–647. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1989.tb14873.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Plant Cell are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES