Skip to main content
. 2005 Sep 12;360(1462):1925–1933. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1724

Table 3.

Parsimony analysis on the four datasets produced trees with minimal length and homoplasy values as indicated.

data Bremer support (no. nodes) no. terminals variable positions no. steps CI RI
total tips sub-cluster basal
water beetles
cox1 284 17 (41) 249 (14) 18 (20) 77 255 1155 35 85
28S 62 0 (32) 28 (14) 34 (16) 63 157 332 76 93
Canthon (all terminals)
cox1 296 13 (39) 240 (10) 42 (10) 61 287 705 52 88
28S 24 0 (39) 17 (10) 7 (10) 62 34 66 68 94
cox1+28S 92 7 (48) 68 (10) 17 (10) 71 321 784 53 89
Canthon (core terminals)
cox1 260 10 (27) 214 (10) 36 (11) 50 284 695 52 85
28S 24 0 (27) 16 (10) 8 (11) 50 34 66 68 94
cox1+28S 277 12 (27) 224 (10) 41 (11) 50 318 774 53 86

Bremer Support was calculated for three categories of nodes, corresponding to those near the tips within a cluster (tips), the nodes immediately below a cluster (sub-cluster) and the nodes defining basal relationships between the clusters (basal). The number given is the sum of the nodal Bremer Support values for this category in the entire tree, and numbers in parentheses give the number of nodes assigned to each category (many of them collapsed near the tips because sequences are identical or very similar). Total Bremer Support refers to the sum of the values for the entire tree. For Canthon, a combined analysis of cox1 and 28S datasets was conducted, either combining all terminals in a single ‘supermatrix’ (all terminals), or removing all terminals which were not complete for either one of the two gene partitions (core terminals, n=50).