Skip to main content
. 2006 Oct;72(10):6452–6460. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00313-06

TABLE 2.

Comparisons of Cramér-von Mises statistics between clone library sequences from conducive and suppressive peats in unamended samples (T0) and samples after damping-off bioassay (T3)

Sequence type Time point Test statistica No. of sequences P valueb
16S rRNA (bacterial) T0 ΔCCS 45 0.77
ΔCSC 45 0.036*
T3 ΔCCS 214 0.036*
ΔCSC 214 0.004**
T0 vs T3 (conducive) Inline graphic 136 0.001***
Inline graphic 136 0.98
T0 vs T3 (suppressive) Inline graphic 130 0.001***
Inline graphic 130 0.93
18S rRNA (fungal) T0 vs T3 (all sequences) Inline graphic 110 0.001***
Inline graphic 110 0.22
a

ΔCCS, test comparing suppressive population to conducive population; ΔCSC, reverse comparison of conducive population to suppressive population; Inline graphic, test comparing population at T0 to that at T3; Inline graphic, reverse comparison of population at T3 to that at T0.

b

*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.