Skip to main content
. 2005 Jun 14;1(3):322–325. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0335

Table 2.

Models analysing factors affecting egg volume and fledging success in meadow pipits.

  egg size fledging success
 

fixed term W d.f. p W d.f. p
altitude 14.02 1 <0.001 0.35 1 0.552
breeding density 0.24 1 0.624 0.21 1 0.646
clutch size 0.67 1 0.411 1.65 1 0.199
year 0.42 1 0.519 0.00 1 0.982
replicate 1.30 5 0.262 0.38 5 0.864
year×replicate 1.14 4 0.337 0.50 4 0.739
lay date 2.96 1 0.085 0.06 1 0.802
(lay date)2 0.29 1 0.588 1.19 1 0.274
sheep density 6.81 1 <0.01 1.82 1 0.177
treatment 1.29 2 0.274 1.90 2 0.150
egg size 0.07 1 0.785

Egg volume data were fitted to a linear mixed model; fledging success data (i.e. number of eggs that produce a nestling that fledges) were fitted to a generalized linear mixed model, with a binomial distribution and logit link function. Fixed terms were fitted sequentially. The significance of the scaled Wald statistics (W) was assessed using F-tests (with denominator degrees of freedom set at 15 by the experimental design) for altitude, breeding density, year, year×replicate, sheep density and treatment, and using chi-squared tests for clutch size, lay date and egg size effects, as there was considerable replication at the nest level. n=82 nests.