Table 4.

Multi-nominal logistic regression by GAM-IV-S^© gambling status

	Comparison I: Predicting gambling status (in full sample)									Comparison II: Predicting gambling status (among gamblers only)
	Recreationala gamblers			Sub-thresholdb gamblers			Gamblers w/PGDc			Sub-thresholdb gamblers			Gamblers w/PGDc
	OR	Range	p	OR	Range	p	OR	Range	p	OR	Range	p	OR	Range	p
Male (vs. female)	2.5	(1.8–3.6)	<0.001	2.2	(1.3–3.6)	0.003	1.5	(0.5–4.4)	0.49	0.9	(0.5–1.4)	0.53	0.6	(0.2–1.7)	0.32
Age (vs. 50 years+)
18–20	0.1	(0.0–0.4)	<0.001	0.2	(0.0–0.6)	0.008	0.1	(0.0–1.3)	0.08	1.3	(0.3–6.1)	0.71	1.0	(0.1–10.9)	0.99
21–34	0.7	(0.5–1.2)	0.21	0.5	(0.2–1.0)	0.06	0.5	(0.1–2.6)	0.40	0.7	(0.3–1.3)	0.26	0.6	(0.1–3.5)	0.61
35–49	0.9	(0.6–1.3)	0.55	0.5	(0.3–0.9)	0.02	2.4	(0.5–10.7)	0.26	0.6	(0.3–1.0)	0.05	2.7	(0.6–12.0)	0.20
Unemployed (vs. employed)	0.5	(0.2–1.3)	0.18	1.9	(0.8–4.8)	0.18	5.2	(1.2–23.2)	0.03	3.6	(1.3–9.9)	0.01	9.9	(2.2–45.1)	0.003
Regular church attendance (vs. not)	0.7	(0.5–0.9)	0.02	0.5	(0.3–0.8)	0.003	0.2	(0.1–0.6)	0.009	0.7	(0.4–1.1)	0.13	0.3	(0.1–0.9)	0.04
Psychiatric/substance use disorders
Alcohol use disorder	1.9	(1.2–3.0)	0.008	1.9	(1.0–3.5)	0.05	0.5	(0.1–2.2)	0.37	1.0	(0.6–1.8)	0.99	0.3	(0.1–1.2)	0.08
Tobacco dependence	1.3	(0.8–2.0)	0.33	2.1	(1.2–3.8)	0.01	3.3	(0.9–12.0)	0.06	1.7	(1.0–2.9)	0.06	2.7	(0.8–9.2)	0.12
TCI personality traits
Novelty seeking	1.1	(0.9–1.3)	0.53	1.4	(1.0–1.8)	0.03	4.3	(2.1–8.5)	<0.001	1.3	(1.0–1.7)	0.05	4.0	(2.0–8.0)	<0.001

^aRecreational gamblers = gamblers without DSM-IV pathological gambling criteria.

^bSub-threshold = gamblers meeting 1–4 DSM-IV pathological gambling criteria.

^cPGD = gamblers meeting 5–10 criteria, thus being diagnosed with pathological gambling disorder.