Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1979 Oct;69(10):1011–1015. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.10.1011

Characteristics of men most likely to respond to an invitation to be screened.

M R Greenlick, J W Bailey, J Wild, J Grover
PMCID: PMC1619152  PMID: 484753

Abstract

Some of the characteristics of men, with known risk factors, who were most likely to respond to an invitation to be screened in a national randomized clinical trial to prevent heart disease were determined in 18,872 men, 35-57 years of age, members of the Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Oregon. Demographic characteristics and risk factor variables (blood pressure, blood cholesterol, and cigarette smoking levels) were abstracted from medical records. The men were ranked high priority or low priority according to level of risk. All age-eligible men in the health plan received at least one invitation to be screened, with high-priority men receiving more invitations. Despite concentrated efforts to bring them in, less than one-half the high-priority men were screened. Participants were older and wealthier than non-participants, and more likely to have more dependents and to routinely use medical services. Whether or not a man received a medical care service within the preceding two years was a powerful discriminating variable in both the univariate and multivariate analyses reported. The findings suggest that health care programs serving a stable population group should give more consideration to screening in routine medical care.

Full text

PDF
1015

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bruhn J. G. Sociological factors related to participation in a screening clinic for heart disease. Soc Sci Med. 1969 Apr;3(1):85–93. doi: 10.1016/0037-7856(69)90041-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fink R., Shapiro S., Roester R. Impact of efforts to increase participation in repetitive screenings for early breast cancer detection. Am J Public Health. 1972 Mar;62(3):328–336. doi: 10.2105/ajph.62.3.328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Freeborn D. K., Pope C. R., Davis M. A., Mullooly J. P. Health status, socioeconomic status and utilization of outpatient services for members of a prepaid group practice. Med Care. 1977 Feb;15(2):115–128. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197702000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Naguib S. M., Geiser P. B., Comstock G. W. Response to a program of screening for cervical cancer. Public Health Rep. 1968 Dec;83(12):990–998. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES