Abstract
Changes in the rates of induced abortions, bilateral tubal ligations, and hysterectomies on the Navajo Indian Reservation have been examined for the years 1972-1978. While the incidence of abortions and tubal sterilizations is still considerably lower among Navajo women than among the total United States population of women, it has risen, especially among those in the prime of the reproductive cycle, i.e., ages 20-34. The rate of hysterectomy has not changed substantially. Regression analyses performed on the data indicate that the utilization of surgery for fertility regulation in women on the Navajo Reservation, unlike other surgical procedures, is not affected by access to hospitals which provide surgery. Rather measures of involvement in the wage work economy are of primary importance. Those areas of the Reservation having the highest levels of such involvement exhibit the highest rates of such surgery.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bombardier C., Fuchs V. R., Lillard L. A., Warner K. E. Socioeconomic factors affecting the utilization of surgical operations. N Engl J Med. 1977 Sep 29;297(13):699–705. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197709292971305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bunker J. P. Surgical manpower. A comparison of operations and surgeons in the United States and in England and Wales. N Engl J Med. 1970 Jan 15;282(3):135–144. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197001152820306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis S., Kunitz S. J. Hospital utilization and elective surgery on the Navajo Indian reservation. Soc Sci Med. 1978 Oct;12(4B):263–272. doi: 10.1016/0160-7987(78)90043-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edwards L. E., Hakanson E. Y. Changing status of tubal sterilization. An evaluation of fourteen years' experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1973 Feb 1;115(3):347–353. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(73)90589-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kunitz S. J. Navajo and Hopi fertility, 1971-1972. Hum Biol. 1974 Sep;46(3):435–451. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kunitz S. J., Slocumb J. C. The use of surgery to avoid childbearing among Navajo and Hopi Indians. Hum Biol. 1976 Feb;48(1):9–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewis C. E. Variations in the incidence of surgery. N Engl J Med. 1969 Oct 16;281(16):880–884. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196910162811606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shelton J. D., Brann E. A., Schulz K. F. Abortion utilization: does travel distance matter? Fam Plann Perspect. 1976 Nov-Dec;8(6):260–262. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slocumb J. C., Kunitz S. J., Odoroff C. L. Complications with use of IUD and oral contraceptives among Navajo women. Public Health Rep. 1979 Jun;94(3):243–247. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slocumb J. C., Odoroff C. L., Kunitz S. J. The use-effectiveness of two contraceptive methods in a Navajo population: the problem of program dropouts. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975 Jul 15;122(6):717–726. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(75)90576-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sullivan E., Tietze C., Dryfoos J. G. Legal abortion in the United States, 1975-1976. Fam Plann Perspect. 1977 May-Jun;9(3):116–129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vayda E. A comparison of surgical rates in Canada and in England and Wales. N Engl J Med. 1973 Dec 6;289(23):1224–1229. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197312062892305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weinstock E., Tietze C., Jaffe F. S., Dryfoos J. G. Abortion need and services in the United States, 1974-1975. Fam Plann Perspect. 1976 Mar-Apr;8(2):58–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]