Table 2.
Associations between positive responses and methodological variables of patients' responses to electroconvulsive therapy. Values are odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) unless stated otherwise
| Study characteristic | Treatment helpful (n=16) | P value | Would have treatment again (n=12) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schedule*: | ||||
| Interval between treatment and interview (scale 0-3) | 0.542 (0.491 to 0.597) | <0.001 | 0.482 (0.422 to 0.551) | <0.001 |
| Complexity of interview (scale 1-4) | 0.804 (0.733 to 0.880) | <0.001 | 0.918 (0.815 to 1.035) | 0.161 |
| No of questions (scale 1-3) | 0.353 (0.288 to 0.433) | <0.001 | 0.508 (0.432 to 0.597) | <0.001 |
| Setting†: | ||||
| Same hospital or treating doctor | 0.861 (0.592 to 1.253) | 0.435 | 0.727 (0.529 to 1.017) | 0.063 |
| Non-treating doctor or some at home | 0.311 (0.154 to 0.629) | <0.001 | 0.863 (0.419 to 1.773) | 0.688 |
| Collaborative | 0.198 (0.137 to 0.285) | <0.001 | 0.276 (0.146 to 0.530) | <0.001 |
| Patient led | 0.124 (0.092 to 0.169) | <0.001 | 0.090 (0.063 to 0.129) | <0.001 |
Per unit increase in scale.
Compared with inpatient.