Skip to main content
. 2003 Jun 21;326(7403):1363. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7403.1363

Table 2.

Associations between positive responses and methodological variables of patients' responses to electroconvulsive therapy. Values are odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) unless stated otherwise

Study characteristic Treatment helpful (n=16) P value Would have treatment again (n=12) P value
Schedule*:
Interval between treatment and interview (scale 0-3) 0.542 (0.491 to 0.597) <0.001 0.482 (0.422 to 0.551) <0.001
Complexity of interview (scale 1-4) 0.804 (0.733 to 0.880) <0.001 0.918 (0.815 to 1.035) 0.161
No of questions (scale 1-3) 0.353 (0.288 to 0.433) <0.001 0.508 (0.432 to 0.597) <0.001
Setting:
Same hospital or treating doctor 0.861 (0.592 to 1.253) 0.435 0.727 (0.529 to 1.017) 0.063
Non-treating doctor or some at home 0.311 (0.154 to 0.629) <0.001 0.863 (0.419 to 1.773) 0.688
Collaborative 0.198 (0.137 to 0.285) <0.001 0.276 (0.146 to 0.530) <0.001
Patient led 0.124 (0.092 to 0.169) <0.001 0.090 (0.063 to 0.129) <0.001
*

Per unit increase in scale.

Compared with inpatient.