Skip to main content
. 2003 Jun 28;326(7404):1439–1443. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1439

Table 2.

Indicators of quality in the medical record for 249 consultations from 25 general practitioners using paperless records and for 280 consultations from 28 general practitioners using paper based records. Values are numbers (percentages) unless stated otherwise

Paperless records (n=249) Paper based records (n=280) P value of difference*
Is there an entry?
No
1 (0.4)
4 (1.4)
0.25
Yes
248 (99.6)
276 (98.6)
Is entry legible?
No
0
16 (5.7)
Partially
0
84 (30.0)
<0.0001
Yes 249 (100) 180 (64.3)
Is entry understandable?
No
2 (0.8)
19 (6.8)
Partially 24 (9.6) 62 (22.1) 0.0001
Yes
222 (89.2)
193 (68.9)
Not applicable 1 (0.4) 6 (2.1)
Does entry seem medically appropriate?
No
4 (1.6)
10 (3.6)
Partially
13 (5.2)
15 (5.4)
Yes
224 (90.0)
217 (77.5)
0.37
Not applicable
3 (1.2)
18 (6.4)
Unsure 5 (2.0) 20 (7.1)
Diagnosis recorded 120 (48.2) 94 (33.6) 0.05
Reason for encounter recorded 239 (96.0) 264 (94.3) 0.56
Symptoms 181 (72.7) 181 (64.6) 0.17
Medical history 18 (7.2) 13 (4.6) 0.24
Family history 11 (4.4) 5 (1.8) 0.09
Social history 22 (8.8) 34 (12.1) 0.30
Lifestyle 13 (5.2) 24 (8.6) 0.20
Patient views 29 (11.6) 26 (9.3) 0.45
Physical examination recorded 130 (52.2) 125 (44.6) 0.21
Clinical values 42 (16.9) 61 (21.8) 0.30
Certification 18 (7.2) 16 (5.7) 0.51
Investigations recorded in notes 41 (16.5) 41 (14.6) 0.62
Referrals made: 31 (12.4) 37 (13.2) 0.80
Specialty recorded 24/31 (77) 22/37 (59) 0.03
Advice given 59 (23.7) 30 (10.7) 0.017
Prescription issued: 127 (51.0) 133 (47.5) 0.52
Dose recorded 110/127 (87) 88/133 (66) 0.005
Frequency recorded 65/127 (51) 77/133 (58) 0.55
*

With clustering by general practitioner taken into account.