Skip to main content
. 2003 Jun 28;326(7404):1423. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1423

Table 5.

Change in risk of stroke (relative odds reduction) for 1.0 mmol/l reduction in LDL cholesterol in randomised trials and estimates from analysis of cohort studies (fig 2) according to whether trial participants had known vascular disease on entry and whether stroke was thromboembolic or haemorrhagic and fatal or non-fatal

Randomised trials
Category No of trials No of events Estimated % change in risk (95% CI) Estimated % change in risk in cohort studies(95% CI)
All stroke 41 3319 −20* (−14 to −26)
All stroke in people with known vascular disease 32 2311 −22* (−28 to −16)
All stroke in people without known vascular disease 7 752 −6 (−22 to 14) −6 (−12 to 1)
Thromboembolic stroke 8 1204 −28* (−35 to −20) −15* (−21 to −6)
Haemorrhagic stroke 8 149 −3 (−35 to 47) 19* (10 to 29)
Fatal stroke 56 678 −2 (−17 to 16) 0§ (−6 to 6)
Non-fatal stroke 40 2519 −23* (−29 to −16) −7 (−13 to −1)
*

P<0.001.

Trials in which there were similar numbers of strokes in patients with and without vascular disease on entry are omitted, except one in which separate numbers were available.w168

From data in figure 2 (taking account where necessary of proportions of non-fatal and all strokes that are thromboembolic and haemorrhagic).

§

Meta-analysis of 45 cohort studies11 (in which nearly all strokes recorded were fatal) gave similar result (2, −1 to 6).