Skip to main content
. 2006 Oct 25;5:92. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-5-92

Table 3.

Prevalence of specific reference reader comments regarding the quality of individual slides read, n = 911

Comments Number Percent
Thick smear red blood cells not lysed or under-lysed 26 2.85%
Artifact or debris present 15 1.65%
Stain deposit present 13 1.43%
Understained slide 12 1.32%
Fungal, bacterial or yeast elements present 6 0.66%
Poor thick smear (unqualified) 4 0.44%
Faint or poor stippling 4 0.44%
Poor mount or cover slip broken 3 0.33%
Overstained slide 2 0.22%
Poor stain (unqualified) 2 0.22%
Poor slide (unqualified) 2 0.22%
Slide not readable 1 0.11%
Dirty prep 1 0.11%