Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2006 Nov 7.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2005 Nov 2;29(4):1185–1191. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.030

Table 2.

Summary data for the TID and TUT sessions

TID session (N = 26)
TUT session (N = 26)
Time-on-task
Percent accuracy
TID magnitude
Time-on-task
Percent accuracy
TUT frequency
% SD M SD M SD % SD M SD % SD
Presentation rate
Slower 27.20 4.13 96.58  6.64 −1.16 1.00 29.64 6.95 92.53 11.33 58.66 26.74
Moderatea 48.04 5.34 95.76  5.13 −1.21 1.00 47.70 9.58 93.65  6.70 47.93 22.66
Fast 67.74 5.27 80.19 19.61 −1.57  .99 64.48 9.46 83.14 11.40 33.68 20.61
Target discriminability
Easya 48.04 5.34 95.76  5.13 −1.21 1.00 47.70 9.58 93.65  6.70 47.93 22.66
Moderate 49.20 4.91 91.52 20.51 −1.40 1.04 47.60 5.09 89.15 10.69 43.45 23.16
Difficult 51.59 3.66 89.10 11.10 −1.62 1.20 50.94 4.69 77.38 19.82 38.33 21.38
Short-term memory load
Easya 95.76  5.13 −1.21 1.00 93.65  6.70 47.93 22.66
Moderate 81.87 27.53 −1.68 1.00 69.01 11.66 37.25 21.72
Difficult 84.62 26.50 −1.54  .97 88.76 12.07 41.12 22.51

Values significantly different across sessions at P < 0.05 corrected.

a

Common difficulty level across factors.