Skip to main content
. 2005 Jan 19;272(1559):149–157. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2933

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) Relationship between relative antler size and complexity (FS relative antler size) and relative testes size (n=75). (b) Relationship between relative antler size and complexity (FS relative antler size) and sperm velocity (FS sperm velocity) (n=73).