Table 2b.

Equilibrium values for the simulation model with penalties imposed either for hunting all species or for selling all species, and a 30% increase in bushmeat prices. Detection probabilities are given as per cent for hunting and for sale. (h.p.a., hours per annum.)

detection probabilities	benchmark (no penalty)	20%—hunting 0%—sale	20%—hunting 0%—sale	20%—hunting 0%—sale	0%—hunting 20%—sale	0%—hunting 20%—sale	0%—hunting 20%—sale
species	numbers	numbers (% CC)	fraction consumed at home	off-take	numbers (% CC)	fraction consumed at home	off-take
grasscutter	566 (31%)	575 (32%)	0	168	1748 (97%)	0.82	25
giant rat	10520 (46%)	9980 (44%)	0.36	3100	22150 (97%)	1	840
bushbuck	110 (16%)	111 (16%)	0	21	503 (75%)	0.65	9
black duiker	1953 (45%)	1966 (45%)	0	29	4126 (95%)	0.99	6
porcupine	191 (47%)	195 (48%)	0.08	100	380 (93%)	0.61	230
Mona monkey	0	0	0	0	570 (100%)	0	0
civet cat	0	0	0	0	200 (100%)	0	0
gun hunting h p.a.	972	938	—	—	0	—	—
snaring h p.a.	11530	10590	—	—	12500	—	—
welfare level	2718	2685	—	—	2600	—	—