Skip to main content
. 2006 Oct 11;3:36. doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-3-36

Table 3.

The results of parameter optimization for scenario B (estimation of pseudo-association rate coefficient in a FRAP experiment).

Estimate Ka* MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaacqWGlbWsdaqhaaWcbaGaemyyaegabaGaeiOkaOcaaaaa@301F@
Initial guesses Optimized values

Df (μm2 s-1) Ka* MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaacqWGlbWsdaqhaaWcbaGaemyyaegabaGaeiOkaOcaaaaa@301F@ (s-1) Kd (s-1) Df (μm2 s-1) Ka* MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaacqWGlbWsdaqhaaWcbaGaemyyaegabaGaeiOkaOcaaaaa@301F@ (s-1) Kd (s-1) RMSE R2

30 3.00 0.1108 30 30.0032 (30.3523) 0.1108 0.00 (0.01) 1.000 (0.998)
30 1 × 10-3 0.1108 30 29.9982 (30.2455) 0.1108 0.00 (0.01) 1.000 (0.998)
30 1 × 10-6 0.1108 30 30.0031 (30.2468) 0.1108 0.00 (0.01) 1.000 (0.998)
30 1 × 106 0.1108 30 30.0030 (30.2478) 0.1108 0.00 (0.01) 1.000 (0.998)
30 1 × 103 0.1108 30 30.0031 (30.2507) 0.1108 0.00 (0.01) 1.000 (0.998)
30 300.00 0.1108 30 30.0030 (30.3188) 0.1108 0.00 (0.01) 1.000 (0.998)
30 10.00 0.1108 30 30.0030 (30.2115) 0.1108 0.00 (0.01) 1.000 (0.998)
30 0.050 0.1108 30 30.0030 (30.1655) 0.1108 0.00 (0.01) 1.000 (0.998)

The values in parentheses were obtained using corrupted data.