TABLE 3.
Hypothesis testing for factors affecting pharmacokinetics of arbekacin
Question | Model compared | OBJ | ΔOBJ (−2l.l.d.)a | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Full modelb | 2,949.705 | ||||
Is CL proportional to CLCR? | |||||
CLCR < 80 ml/min | Full model vs θ1 = 0 | 3,094.280 | 144.575 | <0.001 | |
CLCR ≥ 80 ml/min | Full model vs θ5 = 0 | 2,963.974 | 14.269 | <0.001 | |
Is CL proportional to patient WT? (CLCR ≥ 80 ml/min) | Full model vs θ6 = 0 | 2,968.591 | 18.886 | <0.001 | |
Is CL inversely proportional to age? | Full model vs θ7 = 0 | 2,971.777 | 22.072 | <0.001 | |
Do patients with pneumonia or sepsis have different V1 values? | Full model vs θ8 = 1 | 3,006.228 | 56.523 | <0.001 | |
Do patients with other infections have different V1 values? | Full model vs θ9 = 1 | 2,969.434 | 19.729 | <0.001 | |
Full model vs θ9 = θ8 | 2,954.717 | 5.012 | 0.025 | ||
Do elderly people have different V1 values? | Full model vs θ10 = 1 | 2,955.665 | 5.960 | 0.014 | |
Do patients with infectious diseases other than pneumonia have different V2 values? | Full model vs θ11 = 1 | 2,972.816 | 23.111 | <0.001 | |
Do patients with pneumonia have different V2 values? | Full model vs θ12 = 1 | 2,953.524 | 3.819 | 0.05 | |
Full model vs θ12 = θ11 | 2,966.097 | 16.392 | <0.001 |
−2l.l.d., −2(log likelihood difference).
CL = θ1CLCR + (θ7/age) (CLCR < 80 ml/min), CL = θ5CLCR + θ6WT + (θ7/age) (CLCR ≥ 80 ml/min) V1 healthy = θ2WT, V1 = θ8V1 healthy (pneumonia or sepsis), V1 = θ9V1 healthy (infections other than pneumonia and sepsis), V1 elderly = θ10V1 nonelderly, V2 healthy = θ3, V2 = θ11V2 healthy (except pneumonia), V2 = θ12V2 healthy (pneumonia), Q = θ4.