Table 4.
Sensitivity and specificity of orthopaedic tests for cervical radiculopathy
| Authors | No. of Subjects | Test | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | QUADAS Score |
| Shah & Rajshekhar [10] | 50 | Spurling | 92 | 95 | 11 |
| Wainner et al [16] | 82 | Spurling A | 50 | 86 | |
| Spurling B | 50 | 74 | |||
| Shoulder Abduction | 17 | 92 | |||
| Valsalva | 22 | 94 | 11 | ||
| Cervical Distraction | 44 | 90 | |||
| Median N. Tension | 97 | 22 | |||
| Radial N. Tension | 72 | 33 | |||
| Viikari-Juntura et al [20] | 43 | Spurling | 28 * 33 ** | 100 | 9 |
| Cervical Distraction | 26 | ||||
| Shoulder Abduction | 31 * 42 ** | ||||
| Tong et al [25] | 255 | Spurling | 30 | 93 | 7 |
| Sandmark & Nisell [27] | 75 | Spurling | 77 | 92 | 4 |
| Radial N. Tension | 77 | 94 | |||
* = applies to the right hand side, ** = applies to the left hand side