Skip to main content
. 2005 Jan 29;360(1453):21–46. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1580

Table 2.

Situation by 2020 (Delgado et al. 2003).

(Apparent errors are caused by rounding of values. Fishmeal equivalent round weight: using a conversion factor of 5.)

price difference (%)

scenarios food fish supply (106 t) capture (106 t) aquaculture (106 t) fish meal (106 t) (round weight) consumption (kg per capita) high-value species low-value species fishmeal
present situation (1997) 93 64 29 15.7
baseline scenario 130 76 54 39.5 17.1 15 6 18
50% faster aquaculture development rate 144 74 69 19.0 9 −12 42
if Chinese production was overestimated 123 69 53 16.1 16 6 21
with more efficient use of feeds in aquaculture 131 77 54 17.2 14 5 −16
50% slower aquaculture development rate 119 76 41 15.7 19 25 0
gradual resource depletion 108 53 55 14.2 69 35 134