Table 2.
Situation by 2020 (Delgado et al. 2003).
(Apparent errors are caused by rounding of values. Fishmeal equivalent round weight: using a conversion factor of 5.)
price difference (%) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
scenarios | food fish supply (106 t) | capture (106 t) | aquaculture (106 t) | fish meal (106 t) (round weight) | consumption (kg per capita) | high-value species | low-value species | fishmeal |
present situation (1997) | 93 | 64 | 29 | — | 15.7 | — | — | — |
baseline scenario | 130 | 76 | 54 | 39.5 | 17.1 | 15 | 6 | 18 |
50% faster aquaculture development rate | 144 | 74 | 69 | — | 19.0 | 9 | −12 | 42 |
if Chinese production was overestimated | 123 | 69 | 53 | — | 16.1 | 16 | 6 | 21 |
with more efficient use of feeds in aquaculture | 131 | 77 | 54 | — | 17.2 | 14 | 5 | −16 |
50% slower aquaculture development rate | 119 | 76 | 41 | — | 15.7 | 19 | 25 | 0 |
gradual resource depletion | 108 | 53 | 55 | — | 14.2 | 69 | 35 | 134 |