Skip to main content
. 2006 Nov 3;6:271. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-271

Table 2.

Demographic characteristics in the cessation of betel quid chewing. (N = 3291)

Betel quid chewers

Former chewers (N = 251) Current chewers (N = 3040) ORb (95% CI) aORc (95% CI)

N (%)a N (%)a
Gender
 Male 167 (8.2) 1866 (91.8) 1.25(0.95–1.64) -
 Female 84 (6.7) 1174 (93.3) 1.00
Age (yrs)*
 >=45 157 (9.9) 1425 (90.1) 1.89(1.45–2.47) † 1.84(1.40–2.42) †
 <45 94 (5.5) 1615 (94.5) 1.00 1.00
Obesity
 Yes 58 (7.3) 742 (92.8) 0.93(0.69–1.26) -
 No 193 (7.8) 2298 (92.3) 1.00
Education (years)
 <=6 137 (8.0) 1572 (92.0) 1.12(0.87–1.45) -
 >6 114 (7.2) 1468 (92.8) 1.00
Age commenced chewing (years)
 >=20 166 (8.0) 1923 (92.1) 1.13(0.87–1.49) -
 <20 85 (7.1) 1117 (92.9) 1.00
Quids per day*
 <=10 134 (8.8) 1397 (91.3) 1.34(1.04–1.74) † 1.24(0.95–1.62)
 >10 117 (6.7) 1643 (93.4) 1.00 1.00
Marital status
 Married 213 (8.0) 2448 (92.0) 1.33(0.93–1.91) -
 Single 37 (6.2) 565 (93.9) 1.00
Ethnicity*
 Taiwan aborigines 218 (7.2) 2800 (92.8) 0.36(0.21–0.60) † 0.40(0.24–0.68) †
 Mixed-Taiwan aborigines 9 (7.0) 119 (93.0) 0.35(0.15–0.80) † 0.47(0.20–1.11)
 Non-Taiwan aborigines 19 (17.9) 87 (82.1) 1.00 1.00
Alcohol consumption*
 No 91 (12.5) 640 (87.6) 2.10(1.60–2.76) † 1.89(1.43–2.50) †
 Yes 157 (6.3) 2323 (93.7) 1.00 1.00
Cigarette smoking
 No 97 (7.1) 1266 (92.9) 0.89(0.68–1.16) -
 Yes 145 (8.0) 1676 (92.0) 1.00

* Significant difference in the prevalence of former and current chewers by Chi-square analysis (p < 0.05)

† Significant difference by logistic regression model (P < 0.05).

a May not total 100% due to rounding.

b Odds ratios (OR) refer to the risk of former chewers versus current chewers according to each variable. OR > 1 indicates a higher likelihood of being a former chewer (quit chewing).

c aOR: adjusted odds ratio for age (years), quids per day, ethnicity and alcohol consumption by logistic regression model; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.