Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ethn Dis. 2006;16(2):357–361.

Table 1.

Socioeconomic and educational comparisons between ARF and non-ARF groups. Subjects were enrolled in a Medicaid-sponsored pediatric cardiology clinic (no. of subjects in parenthesis)*

Characteristics ARF Group (n=26) Non-ARF Group (n=41) Pvalue Hawaii 2000 census (n=1.2 million)
Mean age in years 14.0 (26) 10.8 (41) .002 NA
% Male 62 (26) 56 (41) .66 50 (1.2 million)
% Yearly income <$25,000 63.2 (19) 72.7 (33) .54 16.7 (289,012)
 0–$1 4,999 15.8 (3) 42.4 (14) .15§ 7.9
 $1 5,000–$24,999 47.3 (9) 30.3 (10) 8.8
 $25,000–$39,999 26.3 (5) 12.1 (4) 57.8
 $40,000–$74,999 10.5 (2) 15.2 (5)
 ≥$75,000 0 0 34.3
Household size 7.3 (26) 5.5 (41) .01 2.9 (403,240)
 No. children/house 4.1 (26) 3.0 (41) .03 NA
Number in subject’s bedroom 1.4 (26) 1.7 (41) .35 NA
% In apartment 46.2 (25) 41.5 (41) .34 39.4 (470,512)
% Home ownership 52.9 (26) 47.8 (39) .2 56.5 (470,512)
% With high school diploma 84.6 (age 25+)
 % of mothers 88.0 (25) 89.5 (38) .9 NA
 % of fathers 70.8 (24) 80.0 (35) .42 NA
*

No. of subjects varies with each characteristics because some did not answer all questions.

P value determined by t test.

P value determined by chi-square likelihood ratio and compares all values in subcategory between ARF and non-ARF group.

§

P value determined by test of logistic regression.

ARF=acute rheumatic fever; NA=not available.