Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ethn Dis. 2006;16(2):357–361.

Table 2.

ARF and non-ARF subjects categorized by ethnicity. Percent of total calculated for each major category (no. of subjects in parentheses)

Ethnicity % of ARF (n=26) % of Non-ARF (n=40) % in Hawaii from 2000 Census
≥50% Polynesian 53.8 (14) 17.5(7) NA
 >50% Samoan 319 (8) 59 (2) 1.3
 >50% Hawaiian 12 (3) 89 (3). 6.6
 >50% Tongan 4 (1) 3 (1) <1.3
 >50% Mixed Polynesian (1)* (1) NA
 50% Polynesian (1) (0) NA
≥50% Micronesian 15.4 (4) 12.5 (5) NA
 >50% Micronesian (3) (4) <1.3
 50% Micronesian (1)§ (1)|| NA
≥50% Asian 15.4 (4) 27.5 (11) 41.6
 >50% Filipino (3) (5) 14.1
 >50% Chinese or Korean (1) (1) 6.6
 >50 % Mixed Asia (0) (2) NA
 50% Asian (0) (3)# NA
≥50% Caucasian 0(0) 10.0 (4) NA
 >50% Caucasian (0) (3) 24.3
 50% Caucasian (0) (1)** NA
≥3 ethnicity; none ≥50% 15.4 (4) 32.5 (13) NA
Total 100 (26) 100 (40)
*

Tongan/Hawaiian-Chinese.

Samoan/Hawaiian-mixed.

Hawaiian/Caucasian.

§

Micronesian/Filipino.

||

Micronesian/Korean.

Filipino/Asian, Filipino/Chinese.

#

Korean/mix; Chinese/Caucasian, Japanese/Caucasian.

**

Caucasian/Mixed.

ARF=acute rheumatic fever; NA=not available.