Skip to main content
. 2000 Jun 20;97(13):7058–7063. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.13.7058

Table 2.

Relative affinities, μM, of the different mAbs with regard to series of Hb analogs, as determined by competitive EIA

mAb Hb 9b 10b 12b Ha 13b 11b 5b 5a 12a
PAR 2 3.3 ND ND 36 186 ND ND 750 4,200 ND
PAR 10 0.57 0.48 0.95 23 58 75 143 345 2,450 4,300
PAR 11 0.59 0.45 0.82 23.5 54.5 67 145 303 2,650 3,800
PAR 12 0.75 0.47 0.78 41 31 154 78 206 1,130 5,300
PAR 13 0.42 0.39 0.46 12 18 37 17 66 860 7,850
PAR 14 0.43 0.48 0.45 18 34 37.5 26 54.5 915 6,700
PAR 15 0.71 0.49 0.85 19 69 88 169 340 2,980 3,800
PAR 16 1.0 0.75 1.45 29 109 243.5 255 514 3,240 8,600
PAR 17 0.52 0.50 0.58 13 19.5 38 22 63 940 5,200
PAR 18 0.88 0.70 1.24 32 83 64 187 505 3,610 3,400
PAR 19 0.76 0.60 0.82 37 37 120 95 209 1,140 9,700
PAR 20 1.02 0.51 0.84 58.5 38 126 118 332 1,370 5,550
PAR 21 0.56 0.25 0.88 26 18.5 154 79 219 1,480 6,800

Results are expressed in terms of B/Bo (50%) (see Materials and Methods). Because 12a and 13b are AChE inhibitors (IC50 = 2.7 ± 0.3 μM and IC50 = 48 ± 5 μM), affinity was determined by two-step competitive ELISA and not by EIA, in order to prevent the simultaneous presence in the assay of AChE and its unbound inhibitors. ND, not determined.