Skip to main content
. 2003 Jul;69(7):4183–4189. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.7.4183-4189.2003

TABLE 2.

Comparison of the sensitivity of epifluorescence microscopy, direct PCR, and nested PCR for detecting oocysts retained on membrane filters

Filter No. of oocysts counted (FITC labeled/DAPI labeleda) Sensitivityb as determined by:
Direct PCR Two-step nested PCR
F filtersc
    F1 11/6 Negative ND
    F2 6/5 1+ 4+
    F3 4/0 1+ 4+
    F4 8/7 Negative 4+
    F5 7/4 Negative 4+
    F6 8/4 Negative 3+
    F7 7/5 Negative 4+
    F8 4/2 Negative 2+
    F9 6/5 Negative 1+
    F10 12/10 Negative 3+
    F11 10/7 1+ 4+
    F12e 9/2 Negative 4+
FC filtersd
    FC1 5/2 Negative 3+
    FC2 9/2 Negative 4+
    FC3 9/3 Negative 4+
    FC4 4/1 Negative 4+
    FC5 15/9 Negative 3+
    FC6 2/1 1+ 3+
    FC7 13/10 1+ 4+
    FC8 7/2 Negative 3+
    FC9 12/5 Negative 3+
a

DAPI labelling refers to oocysts containing one to four nuclei.

b

Negative, no PCR product detected on gel; 4+, PCR product yielding a strong band; 3+ and 2+, PCR product yielding medium-strength bands; 1+, PCR product yielding a weak band on the gel; ND, not done.

c

F filters, filters through which seeded mineral water A was passed.

d

FC filters, filter controls (filters onto which a known number of oocysts were deposited [see text]).

e

Filtration of 1 liter of RO water.