Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1984 Aug;74(8):799–803. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.8.799

An epidemiologic study of gypsy moth rash.

R W Tuthill, A T Canada, K Wilcock, P H Etkind, T M O'Dell, S K Shama
PMCID: PMC1651967  PMID: 6742270

Abstract

In 1981, outbreaks of itchy skin rashes were reported accompanying the heavy infestation of gypsy moths (GM) in the Northeastern United States. The rash problem was widespread and a considerable public annoyance. In the spring of 1982, during the period of greatest contact with the caterpillars, a telephone survey was carried out in a highly infested community (HI) and a minimally infested community (LO). Information was collected from 1,000 persons, representing more than 90 per cent of those selected for study. The one-week risk of rash was 10.4 per cent in the HI area and 1.6 per cent in the LO area, for a risk ratio (RR) of 6.5. The occurrence of rash was strongly related to a history of having had a rash in the previous year or having had a caterpillar crawl on the affected area. The combination of both factors additively increased the risk of rash. Hay fever and hanging the wash outside were other related variables. History of allergies other than hay fever since childhood and the use of insecticides were unrelated to rash occurrence.

Full text

PDF
799

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beaucher W. N., Farnham J. E. Gypsy-moth-caterpillar dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 1982 May 27;306(21):1301–1302. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198205273062123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Rash illness associated with gypsy moth caterpillars--Pennsylvania. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1982 Apr 9;31(13):169–170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. De-Long S. Mulberry tussock moth dermatitis. A study of an epidemic of unknown origin. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1981 Mar;35(1):1–4. doi: 10.1136/jech.35.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Etkind P. H., Odell T. M., Canada A. T., Shama S. K., Finn A. M., Tuthill R. The gypsy moth caterpillar: a significant new occupational and public health problem. J Occup Med. 1982 Sep;24(9):659–662. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198209000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. KATZENELLENBOGEN I. Caterpillar dermatitis as an occupational disease. Dermatologica. 1955 Aug;111(2):99–106. doi: 10.1159/000256344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Perlman F., Press E., Googins J. A., Malley A., Poarea H. Tussockosis: reactions to Douglas fir tussock moth. Ann Allergy. 1976 May;36(5):302–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rothman K. J. The estimation of synergy or antagonism. Am J Epidemiol. 1976 May;103(5):506–511. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Shama S. K., Etkind P. H., Odell T. M., Canada A. T., Finn A. M., Soter N. A. Gypsy-moth-caterpillar dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 1982 May 27;306(21):1300–1301. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198205273062122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. ZIPRKOWSKI L., HOFSHI E., TAHORI A. S. Caterpillar dermatitis. Isr Med J. 1959 Jan-Feb;18(1-2):26–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES